Hey There,
Sorry for the late reply on this, been a bit manic this end and am just
catching up.
To be honest, I don't disagree with you really on most of your points. In
regards to the paper, this was that worked for this environment and there
were some other factors behind the scenes (financial,
You could also look at the Satellite 6 upsteam project Katello.
http://www.katello.org/
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Puppet Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to puppet-users+unsubscr...
Hi,
Interesting paper. For full disclosure, I do work for Red Hat, so you
know, I could be biased :)
I agree about Puppet being miles ahead for configuration. For customers
who can, I think they should rely on Puppet instead of Satellite for
configuration, unless they have simple needs.
Bu
Hi There,
At the moment we don't, but it is something we need to look at.
Part of the challenge with this particular environment was that every
system was literally different in configuration and installed package
versions. What I opted to do was pick a modern baseline OS to bring the
whole fleet
Hi.
I really appreciate this knowledge sharing. I currently use Spacewalk
instead of Red Hat Satellite for patch management of my RHEL hosts, but I'm
not happy with it for configuration management and working towards
implementing Puppet. How do you audit and report your current package
level
