Re: [Puppet Users] Re: lsbmajdistrelease fact

2010-12-22 Thread Felix Frank
On 12/21/2010 06:57 PM, Daniel Piddock wrote: > On 21/12/10 17:48, Arnau Bria wrote: >> On Tue, 21 Dec 2010 17:02:20 +0100 >> Arnau Bria wrote: >> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> I've noticed that facter version superior from epel do not >>> display lsbmajdistrelease fact: >> Sorry for the noise, that's not tr

Re: [Puppet Users] Re: lsbmajdistrelease fact

2010-12-21 Thread Arnau Bria
Thanks to both.. > redhat-lsb seems trivial now... an hour looking for diff and it was so easy... thanks again! Arnau -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-us...@googlegroups.com. To unsub

Re: [Puppet Users] Re: lsbmajdistrelease fact

2010-12-21 Thread R.I.Pienaar
- Original Message - > On Tue, 21 Dec 2010 17:02:20 +0100 > Arnau Bria wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > I've noticed that facter version superior from epel do not > > display lsbmajdistrelease fact: > Sorry for the noise, that's not true. > > it works in some systems and it doesn't in other

Re: [Puppet Users] Re: lsbmajdistrelease fact

2010-12-21 Thread Daniel Piddock
On 21/12/10 17:48, Arnau Bria wrote: > On Tue, 21 Dec 2010 17:02:20 +0100 > Arnau Bria wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> I've noticed that facter version superior from epel do not >> display lsbmajdistrelease fact: > Sorry for the noise, that's not true. > > it works in some systems and it doesn't in other

[Puppet Users] Re: lsbmajdistrelease fact

2010-12-21 Thread Arnau Bria
On Tue, 21 Dec 2010 17:02:20 +0100 Arnau Bria wrote: > Hi all, > > I've noticed that facter version superior from epel do not > display lsbmajdistrelease fact: Sorry for the noise, that's not true. it works in some systems and it doesn't in others. I'm sure I have some diff between systems, so,