[Puppet Users] Re: pkgutil package provider (solaris)

2014-10-15 Thread Frederic Conrotte
Hello Like many enterprises, we have an heterogeneous infrastructure with some CentOS and Solaris machines. I was wondering if there are existing plans about creating for Solaris the equivalent of the yumrepo type ? https://docs.puppetlabs.com/references/latest/type.html#yumrepo Something

Re: [Puppet Users] Re: pkgutil package provider (solaris)

2014-10-15 Thread Wil Cooley
On Oct 15, 2014 3:55 AM, Frederic Conrotte frederic.conro...@gmail.com wrote: Hello Like many enterprises, we have an heterogeneous infrastructure with some CentOS and Solaris machines. I was wondering if lookthere are existing plans about creating for Solaris the equivalent of the yumrepo

Re: [Puppet Users] Re: pkgutil package provider (solaris)

2010-11-29 Thread Dominic Cleal
Hi Peter et al, Sorry for arriving rather late to this thread! On 16/11/10 10:17, Rudy Gevaert wrote: On Nov 12, 4:54 pm, Peter Bonivart shuttle...@gmail.com wrote: I think the issue with Not installed vs. notinst is probably from converting the pkg-get provider, if I'm not mistaken pkg-get

[Puppet Users] Re: pkgutil package provider (solaris)

2010-11-19 Thread Peter Bonivart
On Nov 16, 11:17 am, Rudy Gevaert rudy.geva...@gmail.com wrote: Pachine parseable output would be very nice, but in my opinion not that 'urgent'.  We can parse it like it is. I will add this as an option but not change the current output then. Later, when you've had a chance to update the

[Puppet Users] Re: pkgutil package provider (solaris)

2010-11-17 Thread Rudy Gevaert
On Nov 16, 3:52 pm, Peter Bonivart shuttle...@gmail.com wrote: I have it checked into SVN so it will be in v2.3 but I haven't set a release date for it yet. Is it a showstopper for you? In that case I could roll a v2.2.1 for you with this. Not for me personally. We will take this

Re: [Puppet Users] Re: pkgutil package provider (solaris)

2010-11-13 Thread Nigel Kersten
On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 7:54 AM, Peter Bonivart shuttle...@gmail.com wrote: On Nov 3, 4:39 pm, Nigel Kersten ni...@puppetlabs.com wrote: We really need community testing with this provider. There are some questions Rudy has in the ticket log that we need to get answered.

[Puppet Users] Re: pkgutil package provider (solaris)

2010-11-12 Thread Peter Bonivart
On Nov 3, 4:39 pm, Nigel Kersten ni...@puppetlabs.com wrote: We really need community testing with this provider. There are some questions Rudy has in the ticket log that we need to get answered. http://projects.puppetlabs.com/issues/4258 Hi, I'm the author of pkgutil, I'm glad you're about

[Puppet Users] Re: pkgutil package provider (solaris)

2010-11-03 Thread windowsrefund
Are there any plans to retrofit this into 0.25.x? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Puppet Users group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-us...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to

Re: [Puppet Users] Re: pkgutil package provider (solaris)

2010-11-03 Thread Nigel Kersten
On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 8:18 AM, windowsrefund windowsref...@gmail.com wrote: Are there any plans to retrofit this into 0.25.x? I haven't looked at the actual provider yet, but you should be able to distribute it yourself with pluginsync to 0.25.x clients once it's been sorted. We really need