Re: [Puppet Users] a basic(?) mount resource

2010-08-05 Thread Tony G.
On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 7:41 AM, Rob McBroom wrote: > On Aug 4, 2010, at 3:11 PM, Tony G. wrote: > > >> If I add `ensure => present`, the entry gets added, but according to the > documentation, "if the filesystem is currently mounted, it will be > unmounted". > >> > >> I don't want Puppet to unmoun

Re: [Puppet Users] a basic(?) mount resource

2010-08-05 Thread Rob McBroom
On Aug 4, 2010, at 3:11 PM, Tony G. wrote: >> If I add `ensure => present`, the entry gets added, but according to the >> documentation, "if the filesystem is currently mounted, it will be >> unmounted". >> >> I don't want Puppet to unmount (or mount) it. I just want it defined in >> `fstab` s

Re: [Puppet Users] a basic(?) mount resource

2010-08-04 Thread Tony G.
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 12:32 PM, Rob McBroom wrote: > I'm trying to use the native `mount` type for the first time and I seem to > have encountered a bug. Here's a simple test I put together: > >mount { "/unixteam": > device => "some_server:/vol/UnixTeam", > fstype => "nfs", > o

[Puppet Users] a basic(?) mount resource

2010-08-04 Thread Rob McBroom
I'm trying to use the native `mount` type for the first time and I seem to have encountered a bug. Here's a simple test I put together: mount { "/unixteam": device => "some_server:/vol/UnixTeam", fstype => "nfs", options => "_netdev,vers=3,tcp,rsize=8192,wsize=8192,noauto",