On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 8:27 AM, dieterdm wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thanks for the replies...
>
> Currently, I made it work using stages.
> But I'll try the approach of putting my resource chaining at the bottom and
> let you know if it works...
>
>
The ordering was my first-guess at the problem, but I wo
Hi,
Thanks for the replies...
Currently, I made it work using stages.
But I'll try the approach of putting my resource chaining at the bottom and
let you know if it works...
Regards.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Puppet Users" group.
To view th
On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 10:01 AM, dieterdm wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have a module that includes several other modules to setup a developer
> workstation.
> Several classes have to run according to a predefined order so I'm using
> resource chaining for this.
> But the problem is that a certain modul
>
> This smells like bug 8040. The ordering of the resources is not transferred
> to the included classes.
>
> It is possible to work around this problem by declaring dummy resources in
> the composite class that mark
> the start and end of the class. The guys from puppetlabs use a custom
> "anchor
Hi,
[snip]
But the problem is that a certain module I include follows the principles of
> Example42 's Puppet modules of splitting up resources in classes according
> to the operating system.
>
[snip]
> When I include this specific class in my developer-workstation module
> below, the resource
Hello,
I have a module that includes several other modules to setup a developer
workstation.
Several classes have to run according to a predefined order so I'm using
resource chaining for this.
But the problem is that a certain module I include follows the principles of
Example42 's Puppet modu
