What's the best way to do inherited roles for servers?
chef seems to excel at this whereas in Puppet it is wordy (at best).
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Puppet Users group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
What do you mean by inherited roles?
R.
On 4 June 2014 23:02, Stuart Cracraft smcracr...@gmail.com wrote:
What's the best way to do inherited roles for servers?
chef seems to excel at this whereas in Puppet it is wordy (at best).
--
You received this message because you are subscribed
http://blog.brattyredhead.com/blog/2011/11/19/puppet-for-chef-users-part-2-when-is-a-node-a/
may help. Perhaps the choice of words was wrong. The issue is how a node
inherits multiple roles.
I would assume from basic class syntax one could just do a::b::c etc to pull
stuff in from
subclassing
On 06/05/2014 01:28 AM, Stuart Cracraft wrote:
I would assume from basic class syntax one could just do a::b::c etc
to pull stuff in from
subclassing and roll it up to the equivalent of chef roles.
Hi,
I suggest that you would be Doing It Wrong then.
The author of the blogpost you linked has
The recommended puppet approach is the role/profile/module pattern.
Here's the blog post that defined this:
http://www.craigdunn.org/2012/05/239/
R.
On 5 June 2014 00:40, Felix Frank felix.fr...@alumni.tu-berlin.de wrote:
On 06/05/2014 01:28 AM, Stuart Cracraft wrote:
I would assume from