The setup can be starts off with a internal VIP created on an internal f5
(behind FW) set up pointing to Nginx then pointing to passenger then --->
puppet master...
again i have a large scales og client/hosts this should work.
On Thursday, November 29, 2012 3:31:46 AM UTC-5, Daniele Sluijt
That depends.
If you start Unicorn and make it listen to a Unix socket then no, you'll
need something in front of it to accept the HTTP connections for you and
then proxy that to the unicorn socket.
You can also tell Unicorn to bind against an IP, in which case you won't
need an nginx in front
we have f5's load balancer can it be used instead of Nginx?
On Wednesday, November 28, 2012 10:30:24 AM UTC-5, jmslagle wrote:
>
>
> On 11/28/2012 09:53 AM, DJames wrote:
> > current dev system is using passenger, but production (babystage) is
> > using 3.0 version, and we have 1800+ servers (pr
On 11/28/2012 09:53 AM, DJames wrote:
current dev system is using passenger, but production (babystage) is
using 3.0 version, and we have 1800+ servers (prod) that will be clients
is passenger the way to go still?
I was previously using passenger and just recently switched to using
nginx
current dev system is using passenger, but production (babystage) is using
3.0 version, and we have 1800+ servers (prod) that will be clients
is passenger the way to go still?
On Wednesday, November 28, 2012 9:34:52 AM UTC-5, Ramin K wrote:
>
> On 11/28/2012 6:11 AM, DJames wrote:
> > ran ac
On 11/28/2012 6:11 AM, DJames wrote:
ran across this, what do you think about Mongrel?
http://projects.puppetlabs.com/projects/1/wiki/Using_Mongrel
It's a more complex config and system for no benefit. Are you having
any problems with Passenger/Apache? It's the simplest and most common
way t
ran across this, what do you think about Mongrel?
http://projects.puppetlabs.com/projects/1/wiki/Using_Mongrel
On Tuesday, November 27, 2012 9:45:28 AM UTC-5, Matthew Burgess wrote:
>
> On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 2:27 PM, Dominic James
> >
> wrote:
> > Question: on my current puppet setup 2.7.3-0
ahh i was hoping the puppet master on 3.0 could handle the transport on its
own, well dealing with 1800+ plus production systems this mechanism could
be an issue...
On Tuesday, November 27, 2012 9:45:28 AM UTC-5, Matthew Burgess wrote:
>
> On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 2:27 PM, Dominic James
> >
> w
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 2:27 PM, Dominic James wrote:
> Question: on my current puppet setup 2.7.3-0 rhel 6.2 centos - passenger is
> used to provide the throughput for the heavy delivery that puppet could not
> do by itself, was this fix in version 3.0 puppet? I will be upgrading to 3.0
> and wil
Question: on my current puppet setup 2.7.3-0 rhel 6.2 centos - passenger is
used to provide the throughput for the heavy delivery that puppet could not
do by itself, was this fix in version 3.0 puppet? I will be upgrading to
3.0 and will like puppet master to push to multiple of clients without
10 matches
Mail list logo
