Re: [puredyne] Next pure:dyne will be free?

2010-10-03 Thread Ricardo Gabriel Herdt
2010/10/3 Aymeric Mansoux : > Ricardo Gabriel Herdt said : > But this still won't make Debian a free system distro as they still > provide a non-free repos then, making them (and Ubuntu) not usable for > building a free derivative, unless you copy the whole repositories and > filter them... Can't

Re: [puredyne] Next pure:dyne will be free?

2010-10-03 Thread Aymeric Mansoux
Ricardo Gabriel Herdt said : > 2010/10/3 Aymeric Mansoux : > > So if I understand this page correctly, regarding package sources and > > derived distros, any Debian or Ubuntu based (live) distro would not > > qualify as free system distro, unless they would copy the whole > > Ubuntu/Debian reposito

Re: [puredyne] Next pure:dyne will be free?

2010-10-03 Thread Ricardo Gabriel Herdt
2010/10/3 Aymeric Mansoux : > So if I understand this page correctly, regarding package sources and > derived distros, any Debian or Ubuntu based (live) distro would not > qualify as free system distro, unless they would copy the whole > Ubuntu/Debian repositories without the nonfree bits? That's

Re: [puredyne] problem with multimedia files

2010-10-03 Thread Stefan Thomas
Dear Dave, thanks for Your explanation. I've activated now mplayer in the preferences menu of firefox, and I've disabled the kaffeine-starter-plugin. But nothing happens, when I click to one of those buttons. --- Puredyne@goto10.org http://identi.ca/group/puredyne irc://irc.goto10.org/puredyne

Re: [puredyne] Why XFCE and not LXDE ?

2010-10-03 Thread Aymeric Mansoux
Lukasz Jastrzebski said : > When p:d switched from dyne-based system that used fluxbox as a > default, to ubuntu-based model, XFCE was really lightweight (in terms > of ram and CPU cycles used), yet very elastic and intuitive. LXDE was > just starting as a mainstream software, there was lots of pro

Re: [puredyne] Next pure:dyne will be free?

2010-10-03 Thread Aymeric Mansoux
Rob Myers said : > On 10/02/2010 05:19 PM, Bernardo Barros wrote: > >Fedora has no non-free software in their repositories. But I think > >they are not listed because of the fedora kernel itself. > > http://www.gnu.org/distros/common-distros.html > > "Fedora does have a clear policy about what ca

Re: [puredyne] Why XFCE and not LXDE ?

2010-10-03 Thread Lukasz Jastrzebski
When p:d switched from dyne-based system that used fluxbox as a default, to ubuntu-based model, XFCE was really lightweight (in terms of ram and CPU cycles used), yet very elastic and intuitive. LXDE was just starting as a mainstream software, there was lots of problems that are now solved and some