Re: [puredyne] xspect

2010-10-11 Thread Dan S
Yeah I like Sonic Visualiser a lot. Nice smooth interface, just remember to install some plugins for it to make it do fancy things. As it happens, it's mainly made by someone two doors down from me :) and I have contributed some patches, am doing more work with it these days. Dan 2010/10/11 Björ

Re: [puredyne] OT: personal observations and ideas regarding pure:dyne

2010-10-11 Thread Tyler Leavitt
I live in a similar setting (more desert than plains) in Central Washington near the university and yes there is a lot of distance between the Americas folks. I'm down for contributing manuals/lessons on various topics (puredata basics, ardour sessions, jack settings, etc...). Recently, I've been

Re: [puredyne] xspect

2010-10-11 Thread Bernardo Barros
Yes, there is also Praat. Both are really good, you won't miss ircam tools. 2010/10/11 Björn Eriksson : > Hello! > Sorry to say I have not yet much experience of different sound analysis > software, the only one I tested, and I found it rather intuitive and well is > Sonic Visualiser - http://www.

Re: [puredyne] xspect

2010-10-11 Thread Björn Eriksson
Hello! Sorry to say I have not yet much experience of different sound analysis software, the only one I tested, and I found it rather intuitive and well is Sonic Visualiser - http://www.sonicvisualiser.org/ - which also is free GNU software. There are probably a lot of them out there... fill in,

[puredyne] xspect

2010-10-11 Thread Stefan Thomas
Dear community, has someone of You experiences with xspect developed by IRCAM? Do maybee recommand other softwares for doing sound-analysis? --- Puredyne@goto10.org http://identi.ca/group/puredyne irc://irc.goto10.org/puredyne