HDD.
This is the first time I see a mission statement that it is not to be
suitable or stable enough to be considered for permanent install.
--
View this message in context:
http://puredyne.466513.n3.nabble.com/puredyne-version-of-puredyne-tp958144p1535393.html
Sent from the Puredyne mailing l
2010/9/16 Claude Heiland-Allen :
> On 15/09/10 22:05, Timmi wrote:
>>
>>
>> DanS wrote:
>>>
>>> The latest is based on karmic; yes, we're planning on a lucid version,
>>> we're (gradually) updating all the packages for lucid (and
>>> maverick...) as we go
>>
>> Since 10.04 is a LTS release, it caus
On 15/09/10 22:05, Timmi wrote:
DanS wrote:
The latest is based on karmic; yes, we're planning on a lucid version,
we're (gradually) updating all the packages for lucid (and
maverick...) as we go
Since 10.04 is a LTS release, it causes me concern that you said you'll make
the upgrades to Luc
the LTS is just fne. (however, the extras in
puredyne sure sound nice!)
--
View this message in context:
http://puredyne.466513.n3.nabble.com/puredyne-version-of-puredyne-tp958144p1483360.html
Sent from the Puredyne mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
---
Puredyne@goto10.org
http://identi.ca/group/puredyne
irc://irc.goto10.org/puredyne
other
reasons. Another is that the minimize-maximize-close window-buttons are on the
left as default.
Rich
> Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2010 16:13:51 +0100
> From: danstowell+pured...@gmail.com
> To: puredyne@goto10.org
> Subject: Re: [puredyne] version of puredyne
>
> The latest is base
The latest is based on karmic; yes, we're planning on a lucid version,
we're (gradually) updating all the packages for lucid (and
maverick...) as we go
Best
Dan
2010/7/11 Stefan Thomas :
> Dear community,
> I want to ask You, if the actual version of puredyne is based on Ubuntu
> lucid lynx or n
Dear community,
I want to ask You, if the actual version of puredyne is based on Ubuntu
lucid lynx or not.
Or are there plans to do this for the future?
---
Puredyne@goto10.org
http://identi.ca/group/puredyne
irc://irc.goto10.org/puredyne
