On 20.01.2023 14:17, Thomas Lamprecht wrote:
Am 20/01/2023 um 13:56 schrieb Matthias Heiserer:
On 18.01.2023 15:07, Thomas Lamprecht wrote:
for subject: s/GUI/ui/ to better match the predominantly used one.
Am 17/01/2023 um 13:17 schrieb Matthias Heiserer:
Sets the EFI version to 2m when arch
Am 20/01/2023 um 12:17 schrieb Lukas Wagner:
> Consider this an RFC to maybe spark up a discussion about this.
>
> In our UI, we've been a bit inconsistent with the use of checkboxes/text
> for `enabled` properties in table views. Looking through the UI, I've
> found that the following UI element
Am 20/01/2023 um 12:16 schrieb Matthias Heiserer:
>>
>> I'm not that huge fan of applying JavaScript's const broadly to non-scalar
>> values,
>> as it's only a shallow constant and immutable; so no effect on array/object
>> member.
>
> I quite like const, especially with `const me = this`, becau
On Fri, Jan 20, 2023 at 01:38:23PM +0100, Moayad Almalat wrote:
> By including and using 'split_list' from PVE::Tools we can avoid the null
> (\000) bytes in the shell_quote() function, in which the 'split_list' takes
> a single argument, to return the array format.
> Thanks wolfgang.
>
> Signed-o
Am 20/01/2023 um 13:56 schrieb Matthias Heiserer:
> On 18.01.2023 15:07, Thomas Lamprecht wrote:
>> for subject: s/GUI/ui/ to better match the predominantly used one.
>>
>> Am 17/01/2023 um 13:17 schrieb Matthias Heiserer:
>>> Sets the EFI version to 2m when arch=aarch64.
>>>
>>> When the VM has ar
On 18.01.2023 15:07, Thomas Lamprecht wrote:
for subject: s/GUI/ui/ to better match the predominantly used one.
Am 17/01/2023 um 13:17 schrieb Matthias Heiserer:
Sets the EFI version to 2m when arch=aarch64.
When the VM has arch=aarch64, creating an EFI disk failed with
"Can't use an undefined
By including and using 'split_list' from PVE::Tools we can avoid the null
(\000) bytes in the shell_quote() function, in which the 'split_list' takes
a single argument, to return the array format.
Thanks wolfgang.
Signed-off-by: Moayad Almalat
---
PVE/CLI/pvesh.pm | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 inse
>From a usability view, having a checkbox that is not clickable is pretty
misleading, especially if the visual style is exactly the same as in
other places in the UI where the checkbox is functional.
Signed-off-by: Lukas Wagner
---
www/manager6/dc/Backup.js| 7 ++-
www/manager6/grid/
>From a usability view, having a checkbox that is not clickable is pretty
misleading, especially if the visual style is exactly the same as in
other places in the UI where the checkbox is functional.
Signed-off-by: Lukas Wagner
---
src/node/APTRepositories.js | 7 +++
1 file changed, 3 inser
Consider this an RFC to maybe spark up a discussion about this.
In our UI, we've been a bit inconsistent with the use of checkboxes/text
for `enabled` properties in table views. Looking through the UI, I've
found that the following UI elements use a checkbox UI control to
indicate wheter somethin
On 18.01.2023 15:03, Thomas Lamprecht wrote:
Am 17/01/2023 um 13:17 schrieb Matthias Heiserer:
Signed-off-by: Matthias Heiserer
---
www/manager6/qemu/HDEfi.js | 12 ++--
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/www/manager6/qemu/HDEfi.js b/www/manager6/qemu/HDEfi
fixed a small spelling and grammar error I stumbled over
Signed-off-by: Noel Ullreich
---
PVE/API2/Qemu.pm | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/PVE/API2/Qemu.pm b/PVE/API2/Qemu.pm
index c87602d..587bb22 100644
--- a/PVE/API2/Qemu.pm
+++ b/PVE/API2/Qemu.pm
@@ -840,7
Suggest an alternative solution by removing the problematic volumes
from the replication target rather than the whole job.
This is helpful if there are multiple replicated volumes to avoid the
need to fully re-sync all volumes in many cases.
Signed-off-by: Fiona Ebner
---
src/PVE/Replication.pm
Note that PVE::Storage::volume_snapshot_info() will fail when a volume
does not exist, so no non-existing volume will end up in the result
(prepare() is only called with volumes that should exist).
This makes it possible to detect a volume without snapshots in the
result of prepare(), and as a con
Am 18/01/2023 um 15:35 schrieb Dominik Csapak:
> so it's clear what the first time is, for that we have to disable
> sorting, since the rownumberer will not sort with it
>
> Signed-off-by: Dominik Csapak
> ---
> not sure if it's worth losing the sorting...
IMO it isn't, if we would need to calcu
Am 20/01/2023 um 09:47 schrieb Lukas Wagner:
> In JS, a `for (const a in <...>)` loop iterates over indices, not
> over values. To iterate over values, `for (const a of <..>)` has
> to be used. Furthermore, filtering by ID did not work properly, since
> the property is called `vmid`, not `id`.
see
In JS, a `for (const a in <...>)` loop iterates over indices, not
over values. To iterate over values, `for (const a of <..>)` has
to be used. Furthermore, filtering by ID did not work properly, since
the property is called `vmid`, not `id`.
Signed-off-by: Lukas Wagner
---
www/manager6/dc/Backup
17 matches
Mail list logo
