Hi,
I just sent a patch to fix ipv6 RA.
(we need to remove listen-ip from config, and use interface=, to
get it work)
I correctly see the packet sent now:
Nov 22 08:55:13 formationkvm3 dnsmasq-dhcp[1222769]: IPv6 router
advertisement enabled
Nov 22 08:55:13 formationkvm3 dnsmasq[1222769]: c
"DERUMIER, Alexandre" writes:
> Another example with custom dhcpv6 options + client script
>
> https://antiphishing.cetsi.fr/proxy/v3?i=Z09lbVhROVBaOHd3NjZZMVfTogSU
> UCLtvQYv_TI7-
> Qg&r=eVVJWkdic3NtZTdZV2pycd0wEJhcfg3n60sFMbDyx7fGbFFjGiZx-
> 8mpk_5ozxPQiZBWULDfan1Z0cBIdGk9Gw&f=UU9IMnpkdmJmSk9
"DERUMIER, Alexandre" writes:
> Another example with custom dhcpv6 options + client script
>
> https://serverfault.com/a/528425
Thank you very much for clarifying. So the /128 is fine.
I also tried to ping6 dead:beef::1 to reach the gateway or from the host
to reach the VM and that did not work
Another example with custom dhcpv6 options + client script
https://serverfault.com/a/528425
___
pve-devel mailing list
pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel
see this old article:
https://www.isc.org/blogs/routing-configuration-over-dhcpv6-2/
for the custom dhcp option + script on client side
___
pve-devel mailing list
pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel
>>
>>I tested the DHCPv6 setup now and unfortunately it does not work
>>fully.
>>
>>I have a VNet with both IPv4 and IPv6 subnets.
>>The IPAM part works correctly, registering both IPv4 and IPv6.
>>In the VM I can get an IPv4 from the DHCP but IPv6 does not work.
>>
>>I only get a /128 address but
"DERUMIER, Alexandre" writes:
>>> * dnsmasq and IPv6 (and DHCP in general) do not really play well
>>>together,
>>> so using subnets with IPv6 configured is wonky
>
> I didn't have tested yet, but it's seem that dnsmasq only support old
> classic duid reservation and not mac ?
>
I tested the
Am 17/11/2023 um 12:39 schrieb Stefan Hanreich:
> pve-network:
>
> Alexandre Derumier (3):
> sdn: fix tests
> sdn: fix subnets && netbox ipam tests
> add add_dhcp_mapping
>
> Stefan Hanreich (12):
> sdn: preparations for DHCP plugin
> subnet: add dhcp options
> sdn: zone: add dhcp opt
>>* dnsmasq and IPv6 (and DHCP in general) do not really play well
>>together,
>> so using subnets with IPv6 configured is wonky
It should be fixed my last patches.
The default gw with RA is still buggy for me.
I wonder if after 8.1 release, we shouldn't also implement static
configuration (t
Proxmox VE development discussion
À: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com ,
s.hanre...@proxmox.com
Objet: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH v4 cluster/network/manager/qemu-
server/container/docs 00/33] Add support for DHCP servers to SDN
Date: 17/11/2023 17:09:51
> > I've checked the documentation and it seems
>>I've checked the documentation and it seems to support it (in our
case
>>at least, since we have direct connection - correct me if I am
wrong):
>>From [1], the documentation for dhcp-host:
>>" Note that in IPv6 DHCP, the hardware address may not be available,
>>though it normally is for direc
On 11/17/23 17:05, Stefan Hanreich wrote:
> Maybe the issue here are the respective fwbr interfaces inbetween?
I guess that's unlikely since that would affect VMs as well I suppose
___
pve-devel mailing list
pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
https://list
On 11/17/23 16:47, DERUMIER, Alexandre wrote:
>>> * dnsmasq and IPv6 (and DHCP in general) do not really play well
>>> together,
>>> so using subnets with IPv6 configured is wonky
>
> I didn't have tested yet, but it's seem that dnsmasq only support old
> classic duid reservation and not m
>> * dnsmasq and IPv6 (and DHCP in general) do not really play well
>>together,
>> so using subnets with IPv6 configured is wonky
I didn't have tested yet, but it's seem that dnsmasq only support old
classic duid reservation and not mac ?
because kea allow mac reservation for
https://kea.re
This patch series adds support for automatically deploying dnsmasq as a DHCP
server to a simple SDN Zone. This series is now in a state where I think it is
okay to integrate into the respective repositories **except** for pve-container
You can (and should) check out the documentation, but here is
15 matches
Mail list logo
