> If you're pointing to this thread:
> http://pve.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/2012-August/thread.html#3412
>
> I hardly see any discussion, just a no-statement with a vague "we want to keep
> vzdump simple"
This is a quite good reasons!
Besides, I would also want to be able to do backup of
Hi Kamil,
Thanks for the clarification. It's refreshing to see there is a
technical reason for this and a solution is in the works.
For me, currently the major problem with the patches is that they make
more difficult to maintain the patched proxmoxes; we have clients that
can afford the ine
Hi,
what is the status of Alexandre's patches? Is there any chance for
integration?
Work great for me.
Greets,
Stefan
___
pve-devel mailing list
pve-devel@pve.proxmox.com
http://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel
> what is the status of Alexandre's patches? Is there any chance for
> integration?
>
> Work great for me.
AFAIK they need extra ebtables packages, not available on wheezy? But yes, I
would
like to integrate that after the new release stabilize (in a few weeks).
__
Am 20.09.2014 08:00, schrieb Dietmar Maurer:
what is the status of Alexandre's patches? Is there any chance for integration?
Work great for me.
AFAIK they need extra ebtables packages, not available on wheezy? But yes, I
would
like to integrate that after the new release stabilize (in a few
Hi all,
I just found out about this blog:
http://ayufan.eu/projects/proxmox-ve-differential-backups/
You surely know about it; I was curious about the reasons to reject the
patches and also about whether there are any plans for incremental or
differential backups. I think it would be a popular
Hi,
> I just found out about this blog:
> http://ayufan.eu/projects/proxmox-ve-differential-backups/
>
> You surely know about it; I was curious about the reasons to reject the
> patches
> and also about whether there are any plans for incremental or differential
> backups. I think it would be a
Hi Martin,
On 19/09/14 11:07, Martin Maurer wrote:
I just found out about this blog:
http://ayufan.eu/projects/proxmox-ve-differential-backups/
You surely know about it; I was curious about the reasons to reject the patches
and also about whether there are any plans for incremental or different
Hi Eneko,
My patches try to add one of missing features, but the way it works is
not very efficient, because it uses xdelta3 to create differential. It
not only uses extra CPU cycle, but also requires you to read
previously done backup. In the future it should be done on qemu level.
Qemu should tr
Hi,
last patches I have found are here:
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2014-03/msg05250.html
- Mail original -
De: "Kamil Trzciński"
À: "Eneko Lacunza"
Cc: pve-devel@pve.proxmox.com
Envoyé: Vendredi 19 Septembre 2014 11:57:13
Objet: Re: [pve-devel] Incremental bac
10 matches
Mail list logo
