Re: [pve-devel] UUID for VM's and disks

> The use of VMID's for disks is becoming an issue for us with Ceph. We > cannot have multiple PVE clusters sharing the same pool on Ceph as > there will be duplicate VMID's across the clusters that will result in > a clash of RBD names on Ceph. I am sure this would be an issue with > iSCSI+ZFS

[pve-devel] UUID for VM's and disks

Hi, Have the Promox VE team thought about using UUID's for VM's as well as for Disks ? The use of VMID's for disks is becoming an issue for us with Ceph. We cannot have multiple PVE clusters sharing the same pool on Ceph as there will be duplicate VMID's across the clusters that will result in

Re: [pve-devel] ZOL now available in Debian

> ZOL is now officially available in Debian repo's. > http://people.skolelinux.org/pere/blog/Debian_now_with_ZFS_on_Linux_included.html > > Maybe better to backport ZOL from unstable than using upstream from ZOL? yes, that would be an option. AFAIK there are also packages from ubuntu, but they

[pve-devel] ZOL now available in Debian

Hi all, ZOL is now officially available in Debian repo's. http://people.skolelinux.org/pere/blog/Debian_now_with_ZFS_on_Linux_included.html Maybe better to backport ZOL from unstable than using upstream from ZOL? -- Hilsen/Regards Michael Rasmussen Get my public GnuPG keys: michael rasmussen

Re: [pve-devel] Maximum Bind-Mounts

> I have a filesystem called images with child filesystems of each year going > back to the 80s. And what is the purpose of such setup? Wouldn't it be simpler to merge those old child file systems into a single one? ___ pve-devel mailing list

Re: [pve-devel] Maximum Bind-Mounts

Hi Dietmar, On Sun, May 15, 2016 at 7:19 AM, Dietmar Maurer wrote: > > > I needed more (bind of ZFS filesystem with a lot of children) so I > > increased the maximum in /usr/share/perl5/PVE/LXC/Config.pm and it worked > > fine. > > Would you mind to explain why you need more