> Backported targetcli-fb (binary and source) included dependencies can
> get downloaded here:
> http://ftp.datanom.net/pve/targetcli-fb-backports.tgz
What did you change exactly?
The changelogs just mentions:
* Rebuild for jessie-backports.
Something else changed?
And did you already run some
On Tue, 18 Oct 2016 17:34:15 +0200 (CEST)
Dietmar Maurer wrote:
> > If I backport targetcli from stretch would you accept the package?
>
> yes
>
> > BTW. Seems Redhat/Fedora/Ubuntu/Debian have forked the original
> > targetcli to targetcli-fb so it seems advisable to
> The only think:
>
> I still don't known how to manage the case of target node crash after the disk
> are migrate, but vm still on source node.
What about the suggestion from Wolfgang: "make drive-mirror write to both disks"
(local and remote)
I guess that would solve the whole problem?
> If I backport targetcli from stretch would you accept the package?
yes
> BTW. Seems Redhat/Fedora/Ubuntu/Debian have forked the original
> targetcli to targetcli-fb so it seems advisable to follow this path.
Yes.
___
pve-devel mailing list
>>That sounds worse ;-)
>>The only real solution is to make drive-mirror write to both disks in a
>>raid-1 fashion once the initial sync is completed in order to be able to
>>detach the destination in an error case without losing data.
yes, I think it's possible to use multiple drive-mirror in
>>I don't really understand that. I thought we will only migrate local disks.
>>IMHO
>>it makes no
>>sense to migrate a shared disk to a local storage?
It was in case of my 2nd proposal of new vmid for target.
The advantage was that each vm.conf have their own local disk. (no orphans disk
in
The cgroup value memory.usage_in_bytes includes the memory used by
file buffers and other caches, resolve this by getting the cache
value from the memory.stat file and substract it from
memory.usage_in_bytes when calculating the current memory usage of
the CT.
This results in the same value as a
On Tue, 18 Oct 2016 14:25:10 +0200 (CEST)
Dietmar Maurer wrote:
>
> Sure. But what we need is a working, fast, iscsi target.
> So we need the lio userspace tool, which are hopefully available
> in next Debian...
>
If I backport targetcli from stretch would you accept the
On Tue, 18 Oct 2016 13:02:39 +0200 (CEST)
Dietmar Maurer wrote:
> > Therefore I suggest to tag the pve-kernel-4.x so that it conflicts with
> > iscsitarget-dkms.
>
> What for? The user will notice that it does not compile anyways? I guess
> there are many dkms modules
> Therefore I suggest to tag the pve-kernel-4.x so that it conflicts with
> iscsitarget-dkms.
What for? The user will notice that it does not compile anyways? I guess
there are many dkms modules that does not compile with our kernel.
___
pve-devel
___
pve-devel mailing list
pve-devel@pve.proxmox.com
http://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel
Hi all,
See my reply here:
https://forum.proxmox.com/threads/low-overhead-low-level-method-of-sharing-filesystems.29691/#post-149715
The removal request for Debian can be found here:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=834523
Therefore I suggest to tag the pve-kernel-4.x so that
Those globally defined regexpes were only used in Toolkit.js
---
www/manager6/Toolkit.js | 20 +++---
www/manager6/Utils.js | 70 -
2 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 46 deletions(-)
diff --git a/www/manager6/Toolkit.js
Changes since V1:
* rebase
* drop trailing coma fox in OsDefaults, as it was fixed in between
Emmanuel Kasper (2):
Turn PVE.Utils into a singleton
Move globally defined regexpes into PVE.Utils
www/manager6/Toolkit.js | 20 ++--
www/manager6/Utils.js | 82
This will allow us to add contructed values ( regexp a = stringA + stringB )
into the constructor.
Access to the PVE.Utils properties and methods stays the same.
---
www/manager6/Utils.js | 12 +---
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/www/manager6/Utils.js
applied
___
pve-devel mailing list
pve-devel@pve.proxmox.com
http://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel
---
Makefile | 4 ++--
changelog.Debian | 6 ++
2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile
index 7578b27..1e3acb3 100644
--- a/Makefile
+++ b/Makefile
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
-RELEASE=4.2
+RELEASE=4.3
# also add entry in changelog.Debian
---
pvepatches/fix-init-script-patch | 21 -
pvepatches/install-systemd-services.patch | 62 +--
pvepatches/remove-unneeded-from-control.patch | 17
3 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 61 deletions(-)
diff --git
2014 OVS say githup is the new official git repository.
http://openvswitch.org/pipermail/announce/2014-April/63.html
---
Makefile | 12 +---
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile
index 1e3acb3..87c882a 100644
--- a/Makefile
+++ b/Makefile
@@
On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 01:50:37AM +0200, Alexandre DERUMIER wrote:
> >>Another possibility : create a new vmid on target host, with his own
> >>config.
> >>Like this user can manage old and new vm after migration . and If something
> >>crash during the migration,this is more easier
>
> We
> > The only drawback is that we can't mix local && shared storage in this case.
> > (but I think that if user have shared storage, he don't have need of local
> > storage migration)
>
> >>Not sure if this is a good restriction (Maybe this is a major use case).
>
> Note that you can have
> - qm create 300 -ide0 4 -net0 e1000 -cdrom proxmox-mailgateway_2.1.iso
> + qm create 300 -ide0 local-lvm:4 -ide2
> local:iso/proxmox-mailgateway_4.0-7.iso,media=cdrom
Why don't we keep the cdrom parameter?
qm create 300 -ide0 local-lvm:4 -cdrom local:iso/proxmox-mailgateway_4.0-7.iso
> +
>
applied
___
pve-devel mailing list
pve-devel@pve.proxmox.com
http://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel
On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 08:05:56AM +0200, Michael Rasmussen wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Oct 2016 16:49:30 +0200
> Wolfgang Bumiller wrote:
>
> > Fixes kernel bug #111921
> > ---
> > ...ck-the-IB-LL-address-into-the-hard-header.patch | 365
> > +
> > Makefile
Let 'cdrom' use the pve-qm-ide format, as it's supposed to
be an alias to ide2.
We're not using the 'alias' schema property since the qemu
configs still use a custom parser (due to the
pending-changes system and the filename-to-volume-id
conversion for legacy support) which does not deal with
On 10/18/2016 09:29 AM, Dietmar Maurer wrote:
> applied. But we have the same feature for containers?
Yes. A patch will follow for containers.
___
pve-devel mailing list
pve-devel@pve.proxmox.com
http://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel
On 10/18/2016 08:56 AM, Fabian Grünbichler wrote:
On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 05:44:34PM +0200, Thomas Lamprecht wrote:
This will be used in cases where the VMID may not be important. For
example some users do not care which VMID a CT/VM gets, they just
want a CT/VM.
Signed-off-by: Thomas
applied
___
pve-devel mailing list
pve-devel@pve.proxmox.com
http://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel
applied
___
pve-devel mailing list
pve-devel@pve.proxmox.com
http://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel
On 10/18/2016 08:49 AM, Fabian Grünbichler wrote:
On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 05:44:31PM +0200, Thomas Lamprecht wrote:
The get /cluster/nextid API call is not secured against race conditions and
parallel accesses in general.
Users of the API which created multiple CT in parallel or at least very
On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 05:44:34PM +0200, Thomas Lamprecht wrote:
> This will be used in cases where the VMID may not be important. For
> example some users do not care which VMID a CT/VM gets, they just
> want a CT/VM.
>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Lamprecht
> ---
>
On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 05:44:31PM +0200, Thomas Lamprecht wrote:
> The get /cluster/nextid API call is not secured against race conditions and
> parallel accesses in general.
> Users of the API which created multiple CT in parallel or at least very fast
> after each other run into problems here:
32 matches
Mail list logo