Re: [pve-devel] broken system / pve-firewall

2017-03-19 Thread Dietmar Maurer
> Am 19.03.2017 um 21:42 schrieb Dietmar Maurer: > >> To me the main question is why does pve-cluster provide a default of 0 > >> which disables iptables for bridges and makes pve-firewall useless for > >> linux bridges. > > > > AFAIR this is for performance reasons ... > > sure but pve-firewall

Re: [pve-devel] broken system / pve-firewall

2017-03-19 Thread Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG
Am 19.03.2017 um 21:42 schrieb Dietmar Maurer: >> To me the main question is why does pve-cluster provide a default of 0 >> which disables iptables for bridges and makes pve-firewall useless for >> linux bridges. > > AFAIR this is for performance reasons ... sure but pve-firewall isn't working i

Re: [pve-devel] broken system / pve-firewall

2017-03-19 Thread Dietmar Maurer
> To me the main question is why does pve-cluster provide a default of 0 > which disables iptables for bridges and makes pve-firewall useless for > linux bridges. AFAIR this is for performance reasons ... ___ pve-devel mailing list pve-devel@pve.proxmox

Re: [pve-devel] broken system / pve-firewall

2017-03-19 Thread Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG
Hi, Am 19.03.2017 um 14:44 schrieb Dietmar Maurer: >> After digging around for some weeks i found out that the chain FORWARD >> does not receive packets anymore? > > And hints in syslog? No the reason is simply that net.bridge.bridge-nf-call-iptables is 0 again. Most probably because /etc/sysctl.

Re: [pve-devel] broken system / pve-firewall

2017-03-19 Thread Dietmar Maurer
> After digging around for some weeks i found out that the chain FORWARD > does not receive packets anymore? And hints in syslog? Which kernel do you run exactly? ___ pve-devel mailing list pve-devel@pve.proxmox.com http://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailma