Signed-off-by: David Limbeck
---
Would a bigger filesize (1M or more) be more approriate?
src/PVE/ProcFSTools.pm | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/src/PVE/ProcFSTools.pm b/src/PVE/ProcFSTools.pm
index 80c0425..1b98b1e 100644
--- a/src/PVE/ProcFSTools.pm
+++
This series adds a 'features' config option adding support for nesting,
mounting and some quirks the user should know about when dealing with
these settings.
This makes use of the new apparmor profile generation & namespacing
feature in lxc.
This is updated with Thomas' feedback:
- Dropped the
Signed-off-by: Wolfgang Bumiller
---
Changes to v1:
* In the start code now $unprivileged now means just that, regardless of
whether the $conf->{unprivileged} option or a custom id map is set.
$custom_idmap is now only used where required.
* Access to 'features' is now limited to
Signed-off-by: Wolfgang Bumiller
---
No changes in this patch
src/PVE/LXC/Config.pm | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/src/PVE/LXC/Config.pm b/src/PVE/LXC/Config.pm
index ac0859a..c21b69e 100644
--- a/src/PVE/LXC/Config.pm
+++ b/src/PVE/LXC/Config.pm
@@ -414,6 +414,8 @@ my
This add a new api to online reload networking configuration
with ifupdown2.
This work with native ifupdown2 modules, as ifupdown2 have
interface dependency relationships.
Some specific interfaces options can't be reloaded online
(because kernel don't implement it), it this case, we ifdown/ifup
On Mon, Oct 1, 2018 at 7:40 PM Fabian Grünbichler
wrote:
> we just recently discussed this again internally, and we will come up
> with some kind of solution in time for PVE 6.x (one way or another, we
> still need to test all the possible ways to tackle this before deciding
> which way to go).
On Tue, Oct 2, 2018 at 8:10 AM Dietmar Maurer wrote:
>
> I thought we all agreed that swap does not make sense on
> high memory system?
Very true.
I'd still suggest - as I did for many years on the forums - to install
zram. This can be done automatically and then you have some swap,
compressed
I thought we all agreed that swap does not make sense on
high memory system?
> On Mon, Oct 01, 2018 at 07:43:41PM +0200, Fabian Grünbichler wrote:
> >
> > wouldn't it make more sense to create a swap partition on all boot vdevs
> > instead? if you need swap, this is very cumbersome to do after
>
