at the _monitor() function is a no-op if no job is
>>running, it just feels like a weird API.)
No objection, I'll adapt my patches.
I'll try to update them for tomorrow.
Thanks for the review !
- Mail original -
De: "Wolfgang Bumiller"
À: &q
> On October 20, 2016 at 11:03 AM Alexandre DERUMIER
> wrote:
>
>
> >>I wonder if we should give the clone_disk() - which is called above in a
> >>loop - a parameter telling it to do this. Not only would save us a
> >>query-block-job call in the cases where we qemu_drive_mirror() isn't
> >>cal
I don't have checked network bandwith when multiple job are running in parallel.
Not sure if we should add an option to define number of parallel job ?
- Mail original -
De: "Wolfgang Bumiller"
À: "aderumier"
Cc: "pve-devel"
Envoyé: Jeudi 20 Octobre
On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 02:35:11AM +0200, Alexandre Derumier wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Alexandre Derumier
> ---
> PVE/API2/Qemu.pm | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/PVE/API2/Qemu.pm b/PVE/API2/Qemu.pm
> index ad7a0c0..98865f6 100644
> --- a/PVE/API2/Qemu.pm
> +++ b/PVE/API2/
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Derumier
---
PVE/API2/Qemu.pm | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/PVE/API2/Qemu.pm b/PVE/API2/Qemu.pm
index ad7a0c0..98865f6 100644
--- a/PVE/API2/Qemu.pm
+++ b/PVE/API2/Qemu.pm
@@ -2415,6 +2415,7 @@ __PACKAGE__->register_method({
P
