Hi all,
I just added the latest DRBD9 driver to the kernel, and assembled
Debian packages for the management tools:
https://git.proxmox.com/?p=drbd-utils.git;a=summary
https://git.proxmox.com/?p=drbdmanage.git;a=summary
https://git.proxmox.com/?p=pve-kernel-3.10.0.git;a=summary
I also uploaded b
> DRBD9 isn't ready for his use in a production environment, now is in
> pre-release phase...
> http://www.linbit.com/en/component/phocadownload/category/5-drbd
>
> Respectfully I mean that I believe that will be good wait to that DRBD9 be
> in a stable version before of release it in the pve repo
Oh, OK, sorry
- Original Message -
From: "Dietmar Maurer"
To: "Cesar Peschiera" ; "PVE Development List"
Sent: Friday, March 20, 2015 12:50 PM
Subject: Re: [pve-devel] DRBD9 test packages for jessie
DRBD9 isn't ready for his use in a production
I just want to note that the new DRBD9 has some cool feature
- support more that 2 nodes
- support snapshots
- as fast as DRBD 8.X
I am now writing a storage plugin, so that we can do further tests...
> Oh, OK, sorry
>
> >> DRBD9 isn't ready for his use in a production environment, now is in
> >
From: "Dietmar Maurer"
To: "Cesar Peschiera" ; "PVE Development List"
Sent: Friday, March 20, 2015 2:00 PM
Subject: Re: [pve-devel] DRBD9 test packages for jessie
I just want to note that the new DRBD9 has some cool feature
- support more that 2 nodes
- sup
to
> the blocks of disk that are different and not for the complet storage),
> also
> will be good have it in the PVE-GUI.
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Dietmar Maurer"
> To: "Cesar Peschiera" ; "PVE Development List"
>
> Sent: Frid
supported in the kernels of linux).
- Original Message -
From: Daniel Hunsaker
To: Cesar Peschiera ; Dietmar Maurer ; PVE Development List
Sent: Friday, March 20, 2015 4:34 PM
Subject: Re: [pve-devel] DRBD9 test packages for jessie
I'd rather it run the resync before conti
I'd rather it run the resync before continuing the migration, than simply
abort. It'll take a bit longer to migrate, but I can't think of any reason
it would make sense *not* to run the resync at that point and simply keep
going once >that's done.
Thinking again, maybe will be good that the use
> 1- While a VM is running with LVM on top of DRBD, the replicate storages be
> in secondary mode, ie, only to have a primary storage for each VM that is
> running (that always was the recommendation of LINBIT for security reasons).
The concept with DRBD9 is a bit different, i.e. we will not use
