Hi,
just a little news:
next ceph stable release (coming in 1 or 2 week), have support for syncfs from
kernel.
So no more need to have a glibc with syncfs support.
So maybe it's time to add ceph server support to proxmox ?
Regards,
Alexandre
___
> So maybe it's time to add ceph server support to proxmox ?
So the performance problems are already solved?
___
pve-devel mailing list
pve-devel@pve.proxmox.com
http://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel
> Subject: Re: [pve-devel] ceph news: syncfs kernel support for next stable
> release
>
> > So maybe it's time to add ceph server support to proxmox ?
>
> So the performance problems are already solved?
AFAIK Stefan reported that syncfs support does not
your last bench results ?
Maybe some conf file tuning advice could be fine :)
- Mail original -
De: "Dietmar Maurer"
À: "Alexandre DERUMIER" , pve-devel@pve.proxmox.com
Envoyé: Mardi 4 Décembre 2012 15:53:13
Objet: RE: [pve-devel] ceph news: syncfs kernel support
Hi,
Am 04.12.2012 15:59, schrieb Alexandre DERUMIER:
So the performance problems are already solved?
I can't get more than 6000iops by kvm guest with my current setup. (I don't
know where is the bottleneck, maybe network latency or cpu on my cluster)
But Stefan has achieve a lot more with hi
embre 2012 16:26:24
Objet: Re: [pve-devel] ceph news: syncfs kernel support for next stable release
Hi,
Am 04.12.2012 15:59, schrieb Alexandre DERUMIER:
>>> So the performance problems are already solved?
>
> I can't get more than 6000iops by kvm guest with my curren
>
>
> - Mail original -
>
> De: "Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG"
> À: "Alexandre DERUMIER"
> Cc: "Dietmar Maurer" , pve-devel@pve.proxmox.com
> Envoyé: Mardi 4 Décembre 2012 16:26:24
> Objet: Re: [pve-devel] ceph news: sync
