[pve-devel] pve-storage : volume_lock && volume_unlock

2012-11-29 Thread Alexandre Derumier
This is needed to protect volumes when creating templates ___ pve-devel mailing list pve-devel@pve.proxmox.com http://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel

Re: [pve-devel] pve-storage : volume_lock && volume_unlock

2012-12-02 Thread Dietmar Maurer
dre Derumier > Sent: Donnerstag, 29. November 2012 10:39 > To: pve-devel@pve.proxmox.com > Subject: [pve-devel] pve-storage : volume_lock && volume_unlock > > This is needed to protect volumes when creating templates > >

Re: [pve-devel] pve-storage : volume_lock && volume_unlock

2012-12-02 Thread Alexandre DERUMIER
ange that in my git. - Mail original - De: "Dietmar Maurer" À: "Alexandre Derumier" , pve-devel@pve.proxmox.com Envoyé: Lundi 3 Décembre 2012 06:22:43 Objet: RE: [pve-devel] pve-storage : volume_lock && volume_unlock I think you should not use the term 

Re: [pve-devel] pve-storage : volume_lock && volume_unlock

2012-12-03 Thread Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG
Hi Alexandre, Am 03.12.2012 08:53, schrieb Alexandre DERUMIER: I think you should not use the term 'lock/unlock' here. Maybe something like: volume_protect(true/false) volume_protect seem good. (as snapshot are not really readonly, and rbd already use protect for the rbd command) I'll chan

Re: [pve-devel] pve-storage : volume_lock && volume_unlock

2012-12-03 Thread Alexandre DERUMIER
an Priebe - Profihost AG" À: pve-devel@pve.proxmox.com Envoyé: Lundi 3 Décembre 2012 09:23:46 Objet: Re: [pve-devel] pve-storage : volume_lock && volume_unlock Hi Alexandre, Am 03.12.2012 08:53, schrieb Alexandre DERUMIER: >>> I think you should not use the term

Re: [pve-devel] pve-storage : volume_lock && volume_unlock

2012-12-03 Thread Dietmar Maurer
ve.proxmox.com > Subject: Re: [pve-devel] pve-storage : volume_lock && volume_unlock > > >>It would be cool if we have these git repos public containing new > >>features / work in progress ideas. > >> > >>What about mirroring to github and w

Re: [pve-devel] pve-storage : volume_lock && volume_unlock

2012-12-03 Thread Alexandre DERUMIER
t; Sent: Montag, 03. Dezember 2012 11:15 > To: Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG > Cc: pve-devel@pve.proxmox.com > Subject: Re: [pve-devel] pve-storage : volume_lock && volume_unlock > > >>It would be cool if we have these git repos public containing new > >>fe

Re: [pve-devel] pve-storage : volume_lock && volume_unlock

2012-12-03 Thread Dietmar Maurer
> Cc: pve-devel@pve.proxmox.com; Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG > Subject: Re: [pve-devel] pve-storage : volume_lock && volume_unlock > > >> Why (beside beeing 'cool')? > > I think Stefan want to test without manual patching. Then it would make sense for

Re: [pve-devel] pve-storage : volume_lock && volume_unlock

2012-12-03 Thread Stefan Priebe
Am 03.12.2012 17:06, schrieb Dietmar Maurer: Cc: pve-devel@pve.proxmox.com; Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG Subject: Re: [pve-devel] pve-storage : volume_lock && volume_unlock Why (beside beeing 'cool')? I think Stefan want to test without manual patching. Then it woul

Re: [pve-devel] pve-storage : volume_lock && volume_unlock

2012-12-03 Thread Dietmar Maurer
> The idea is to have a repo where we can track all patches. Right now > someone sends a patch to the mailinglist. Some of them might not be > included directly. And then after some month it might get lost. The idea is to get all those ideas into the main repository asap. I am currently just a li