Hi all,
It's been a while and I have been doing tests in the background.
I found some issues were related to faulty drives, but after removing
them migration issues continued. I had the same issues with PVE 3.2,
nfs, rbd and local storage.
I also noticed that out office production cluster do
Hi
How can I enable default language on PVE??
I try:
language: pt_BR
in /etc/pve/datacenter.cfg
But doesn't work
--
--
Gilberto Ferreira
(47) 9676-7530
___
pve-user mailing list
pve-user@pve.proxmox.com
http://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listin
Hi Angel,
On 29/10/14 10:50, Angel Docampo wrote:
On 29/10/14 09:25, Angel Docampo wrote:
Bonded interfaces on linux are active-backup, so you have a 1Gb
connexion on the storage side. Consider to upgrade to a faster
ethernet/fiberchannel/infiniband.
I don't think this is the case. You can c
On Wed, 29 Oct 2014 09:45:39 AM Dietmar Maurer wrote:
> One big dis-advantage of glusterfs is behavior after node failure. Seems
> glusterfs re-read and compare ALL data when the other node comes up again.
> This produces much overhead and is very slow.
That is a big issue. I guess its an effect
Hi,
On 29/10/14 10:39, Lindsay Mathieson wrote:
(maybe yes on cephfs).
Is that done via a manual mount with proxmox treating it as a directory?
I think so, but never tried cephfs myself.
Cheers
Eneko
--
Zuzendari Teknikoa / Director Técnico
Binovo IT Human Project, S.L.
Telf. 943575997
On 29/10/14 09:38, Eneko Lacunza wrote:
Hi Angel,
On 29/10/14 09:25, Angel Docampo wrote:
Bonded interfaces on linux are active-backup, so you have a 1Gb
connexion on the storage side. Consider to upgrade to a faster
ethernet/fiberchannel/infiniband.
I don't think this is the case. You can co
> One big advantage glusterfs has here is the intermediate filesystem. If
> things go
> totally pear shaped you can just pull one of the replica drives and copy the
> files
> off it. Difficult if not impossible to do that with ceph.
One big dis-advantage of glusterfs is behavior after node failu
On Wed, 29 Oct 2014 09:25:08 AM Angel Docampo wrote:
> Ceph provides block storage while Gluster doesn't, but the latest it's far
> easier to setup. As block storage, Ceph is faster than Gluster, but I have
> all my proxmox virtual environment with gluster running perfectly.
Limiting factor will b
On Wed, 29 Oct 2014 09:06:44 AM Eneko Lacunza wrote:
> haven't deployed glusterfs myself. I think you can put
> CTs/ISOs/backups on glusterfs but not in ceph-rbd
Yes, I think its images only, not a problem for this exercise
> (maybe yes on cephfs).
Is that done via a manual mount with proxmo
Hi Angel,
On 29/10/14 09:25, Angel Docampo wrote:
Bonded interfaces on linux are active-backup, so you have a 1Gb
connexion on the storage side. Consider to upgrade to a faster
ethernet/fiberchannel/infiniband.
I don't think this is the case. You can configure many modes on bonded
interfaces;
On 29/10/14 05:43, Lindsay Mathieson wrote:
Sorry to keep coming back to this :( but we're adding a 3rd node to
our cluster which brings ceph back into the picture ...
Is there a particular reason that ceph is preferred to glusterfs?
better performance? more fault tolerant?
Ceph provides block
Hi Lindsay,
On 29/10/14 05:43, Lindsay Mathieson wrote:
Sorry to keep coming back to this :( but we're adding a 3rd node to
our cluster which brings ceph back into the picture ...
Is there a particular reason that ceph is preferred to glusterfs?
better performance? more fault tolerant?
I haven'
12 matches
Mail list logo
