Re: [PVE-User] VM Quotas

2017-09-06 Thread Dietmar Maurer
> Thanks for the clarification. > Now, which is the best way to make a Feature Request? better send patches ... ___ pve-user mailing list pve-user@pve.proxmox.com https://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user

Re: [PVE-User] VM Quotas

2017-09-06 Thread Christian Jacobsen
Dietmar, Thanks for the clarification. Now, which is the best way to make a Feature Request? On 09/06/2017 01:35 PM, Dietmar Maurer wrote: No, that is currently not implemented. On September 6, 2017 at 6:10 PM Christian Jacobsen wrote: Is there a way to

Re: [PVE-User] VM Quotas

2017-09-06 Thread Dietmar Maurer
No, that is currently not implemented. > On September 6, 2017 at 6:10 PM Christian Jacobsen > wrote: > > > Is there a way to allocate quota (cpu, memory, or disk) for users or > groups to restrict the editing or creation of VMs? > > The idea is to allocate

[PVE-User] VM Quotas

2017-09-06 Thread Christian Jacobsen
Is there a way to allocate quota (cpu, memory, or disk) for users or groups to restrict the editing or creation of VMs? The idea is to allocate limited resources and give the user the freedom to assign them to existing or new VMs. ___ pve-user

Re: [PVE-User] Bonding and packet loss

2017-09-06 Thread IMMO WETZEL
Could you please provide a network diagram. Still valid is that lacp is just for a lag(l2 bonding) link between to l2 devices. If your switches are stacked they should be seen as one l2 device. if not, you cannot bond and use lacp. You need IP multipath to use the whole bandwidth of both links.

Re: [PVE-User] Bonding and packetloss

2017-09-06 Thread Daniel
LACP is used for both switches. My Proxmox Servers are using bonding mode 6 but I get strange bandwith problems: target host host20 -- run 1: 42.3 Mbits/sec run 2: 880 Mbits/sec run 3: 105