> Thanks for the clarification.
> Now, which is the best way to make a Feature Request?
better send patches ...
___
pve-user mailing list
pve-user@pve.proxmox.com
https://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user
Dietmar,
Thanks for the clarification.
Now, which is the best way to make a Feature Request?
On 09/06/2017 01:35 PM, Dietmar Maurer wrote:
No, that is currently not implemented.
On September 6, 2017 at 6:10 PM Christian Jacobsen
wrote:
Is there a way to
No, that is currently not implemented.
> On September 6, 2017 at 6:10 PM Christian Jacobsen
> wrote:
>
>
> Is there a way to allocate quota (cpu, memory, or disk) for users or
> groups to restrict the editing or creation of VMs?
>
> The idea is to allocate
Is there a way to allocate quota (cpu, memory, or disk) for users or
groups to restrict the editing or creation of VMs?
The idea is to allocate limited resources and give the user the freedom
to assign them to existing or new VMs.
___
pve-user
Could you please provide a network diagram.
Still valid is that lacp is just for a lag(l2 bonding) link between to l2
devices. If your switches are stacked they should be seen as one l2 device. if
not, you cannot bond and use lacp. You need IP multipath to use the whole
bandwidth of both links.
LACP is used for both switches.
My Proxmox Servers are using bonding mode 6 but I get strange bandwith problems:
target host host20
--
run 1: 42.3 Mbits/sec
run 2: 880 Mbits/sec
run 3: 105