Re: [PVE-User] Ceph and firewalling

2019-05-08 Thread Alexandre DERUMIER
Hi, I had this problem with cephfs in the vm mainly, when firewall is stopped (rules are flushed - but existing connections still conntrack), then start again the firewall, and conntrack put in invalid because it don't have tracked connection sequence when firewall was stopped. This could hap

Re: [PVE-User] ceph rebalance/ raw vs pool usage

2019-05-08 Thread Mark Adams
Doing some more research this evening, it turns out the big divergence between the POOLS %USED and GLOBAL %RAW USED I've had is because the pool numbers are based on the amount of space that the most full OSD has left. So if you have 1 OSD that is disproportionately full, the %USED for POOLS will

Re: [PVE-User] LVM datastore weirdness

2019-05-08 Thread Dmitry Petuhov
Only volumes with names having format 'vm-X-disk-Y' are shown. Other volumes are not shown in web, this is expected behavior. 08.05.2019 18:17, Roland @web.de пишет: Hello, i have added an existing LVM Volume Group as a Datastore/Storage in Proxmox. For my curiosity already existing logic

[PVE-User] LVM datastore weirdness

2019-05-08 Thread Roland @web.de
Hello, i have added an existing LVM Volume Group as a Datastore/Storage in Proxmox. For my curiosity already existing logical volumes on that datastore are not shown in proxmox webgui. Furthermore, i cannot even see any properties of that storage, i.e. "Show Configuration" button is greyed, so

Re: [PVE-User] ceph rebalance/ raw vs pool usage

2019-05-08 Thread Mark Adams
On Wed, 8 May 2019 at 11:34, Alwin Antreich wrote: > On Wed, May 08, 2019 at 09:34:44AM +0100, Mark Adams wrote: > > Thanks for getting back to me Alwin. See my response below. > > > > > > I have the same size and count in each node, but I have had a disk > failure > > (has been replaced) and als

Re: [PVE-User] ceph rebalance/ raw vs pool usage

2019-05-08 Thread Alwin Antreich
On Wed, May 08, 2019 at 09:34:44AM +0100, Mark Adams wrote: > Thanks for getting back to me Alwin. See my response below. > > > I have the same size and count in each node, but I have had a disk failure > (has been replaced) and also had issues with osds dropping when that memory > allocation bug

Re: [PVE-User] What is the purpose of second gluster server in storage config?

2019-05-08 Thread Thomas Lamprecht
On 5/8/19 10:15 AM, Igor Podlesny wrote: > On Wed, 8 May 2019 at 15:02, Thomas Lamprecht wrote: > [...] >>> -- I didn't open no ticket, neither did I __complain__. I just let >>> others know there's a pitfall, meanwhile thoroughly describing what it >>> was. That's it. >> >> In a mail were a user

Re: [PVE-User] ceph rebalance/ raw vs pool usage

2019-05-08 Thread Mark Adams
Thanks for getting back to me Alwin. See my response below. On Wed, 8 May 2019 at 08:10, Alwin Antreich wrote: > Hello Mark, > > On Tue, May 07, 2019 at 11:26:17PM +0100, Mark Adams wrote: > > Hi All, > > > > I would appreciate a little pointer or clarification on this. > > > > My "ceph" vm pool

Re: [PVE-User] What is the purpose of second gluster server in storage config?

2019-05-08 Thread Igor Podlesny
On Wed, 8 May 2019 at 15:02, Thomas Lamprecht wrote: [...] > > -- I didn't open no ticket, neither did I __complain__. I just let > > others know there's a pitfall, meanwhile thoroughly describing what it > > was. That's it. > > In a mail were a user ask where to open a request for this (i.e., pro

Re: [PVE-User] What is the purpose of second gluster server in storage config?

2019-05-08 Thread Thomas Lamprecht
On 5/8/19 9:37 AM, Igor Podlesny wrote: > On Wed, 8 May 2019 at 14:14, Thomas Lamprecht wrote: >> On 5/8/19 8:57 AM, Igor Podlesny wrote: >>> On Wed, 8 May 2019 at 13:11, Thomas Lamprecht >>> wrote: > [...] >>> In short: pain, suffering and all That. >>> >> >> Yes, things are not always perfect.

Re: [PVE-User] What is the purpose of second gluster server in storage config?

2019-05-08 Thread Igor Podlesny
On Wed, 8 May 2019 at 14:14, Thomas Lamprecht wrote: > On 5/8/19 8:57 AM, Igor Podlesny wrote: > > On Wed, 8 May 2019 at 13:11, Thomas Lamprecht > > wrote: [...] > > In short: pain, suffering and all That. > > > > Yes, things are not always perfect. But instead of complaining, in a bit > dramati

Re: [PVE-User] Proxmox Virtual Environment 5.3-8

2019-05-08 Thread Nicola Ferrari (#554252)
Il 08/05/2019 08:57, Muhammad Monowar Hossain ha scritto: >>> 1. Live migration is not working from GUI >> >> What kind of problem/error are you experiencing? > > 2019-05-08 06:54:18 starting migration of VM 115 to node 'HV-02’ (x.x.x.x) > 2019-05-08 06:54:18 found local disk 'vmdata:vm-115-disk-0

Re: [PVE-User] What is the purpose of second gluster server in storage config?

2019-05-08 Thread Thomas Lamprecht
On 5/8/19 8:57 AM, Igor Podlesny wrote: > On Wed, 8 May 2019 at 13:11, Thomas Lamprecht wrote: > [...] So what happens when one of the configured servers fails, Proxmox recognize the failure and mounts the secondary? If this so the running >>> >>> Proxmox tells you go suffer, that's what

Re: [PVE-User] ceph rebalance/ raw vs pool usage

2019-05-08 Thread Alwin Antreich
Hello Mark, On Tue, May 07, 2019 at 11:26:17PM +0100, Mark Adams wrote: > Hi All, > > I would appreciate a little pointer or clarification on this. > > My "ceph" vm pool is showing 84.80% used. But the %RAW usage is only 71.88% > used. is this normal? there is nothing else on this ceph cluster a