On 3/01/2017 6:38 PM, Kevin Lemonnier wrote:
I'll be very interested in what you think compared to gluster !
I've been looking at it too.
Interesting so far, performance a lot better than the last time I
looked, not on a par with gluster but getting there. Pretty stable to.
Different replica
> Am wanting to trial multiple sheepdog nodes with out proxmox cluster
> and they need to be part of it for that.
I'll be very interested in what you think compared to gluster !
I've been looking at it too.
--
Kevin Lemonnier
PGP Fingerprint : 89A5 2283 04A0 E6E9 0111
signature.asc
Description
On 3 January 2017 at 17:09, Dietmar Maurer wrote:
>> Am wanting to trial multiple sheepdog nodes with out proxmox cluster
>> and they need to be part of it for that.
>
> sheepdog can also use zookeeper, so maybe that is an option?
Yes, that sounds like a safer idea, thnaks Dietmar.
--
Lindsay
> Can a non proxmox box (Ubuntu 16.04) be added to a proxmox corosync cluster?
I would not mix different corosync versions - that is untested.
> Am wanting to trial multiple sheepdog nodes with out proxmox cluster
> and they need to be part of it for that.
sheepdog can also use zookeeper, so may
Can a non proxmox box (Ubuntu 16.04) be added to a proxmox corosync cluster?
Am wanting to trial multiple sheepdog nodes with out proxmox cluster
and they need to be part of it for that.
Thanks,
--
Lindsay
___
pve-user mailing list
pve-user@pve.proxmo
