> So something is not good with QCOW2 disk format.
I guess this is just because it changes a sequential write
order to something more random. You will get different
results if you use other benchmark tools ...
___
pve-user mailing list
On 11/16/2016 08:52 AM, Dietmar Maurer wrote:
>
>> 1) First guest inside qcow2 image, located on NFS share (via 10gbit
>
> What values do you get with raw images?
>
Just now converted guest's disk image to RAW, using default cache
settings. Seeing much better results - same "dd" test now shows
> 1) First guest inside qcow2 image, located on NFS share (via 10gbit
What values do you get with raw images?
___
pve-user mailing list
pve-user@pve.proxmox.com
http://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user
On 11/16/2016 01:22 AM, Brian :: wrote:
> Hi Mikhail
>
> The guest that is running - what type of controller / cache?
>
> Thanks
Brian,
The guest is Debian Jessie, running VirtIO as controller and "Default
(No cache)" cache setting. I tried both writeback / writethrough
settings as well, but
Hi Mikhail
The guest that is running - what type of controller / cache?
Thanks
On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 10:05 PM, Mikhail wrote:
> On 11/16/2016 12:43 AM, Brian :: wrote:
>> What type of disk controller and what caching mode are you using?
>
> The storage server is built
On 11/16/2016 12:43 AM, Brian :: wrote:
> What type of disk controller and what caching mode are you using?
The storage server is built with 4 x 4TB ST4000NM0034 Seagate disks,
attached to LSI Logic SAS3008 controller. Then there's Debian Jessie
with software RAID10 using MDADM. This space is
What type of disk controller and what caching mode are you using?
On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 9:36 PM, Mikhail wrote:
> On 11/16/2016 12:33 AM, Brian :: wrote:
>> 90.4 MB/s isn't that far off.
>
> Hello,
>
> Yes, but I'm only able to get these results when doing simple "dd" test
Ignore my reply - just reread the thread fully :)
NFS should work just fine.. no idea why you are seeing those lousy speeds.
On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 9:33 PM, Brian :: wrote:
> 90.4 MB/s isn't that far off.
>
>
> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 5:25 PM, Mikhail wrote:
90.4 MB/s isn't that far off.
On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 5:25 PM, Mikhail wrote:
> On 11/15/2016 06:09 PM, Gerald Brandt wrote:
>> I don't know if it helps, but I always switch to NFSv4.
>
> Thanks for the tip. This did not help. I also tried with various caching
> options
On 11/15/2016 06:09 PM, Gerald Brandt wrote:
> I don't know if it helps, but I always switch to NFSv4.
Thanks for the tip. This did not help. I also tried with various caching
options (writeback, writethrough, etc) and RAW disk format instead of
qcow2 - nothing changed.
I also have LVM over
I don't know if it helps, but I always switch to NFSv4.
nfs: storage
export /proxmox
server 172.23.4.16
path /mnt/pve/storage
options vers=4
maxfiles 1
content iso,backup,images
Gerald
On 2016-11-15 08:48 AM, Mikhail wrote:
Hello,
Please help me to find why I'm seeing
Hello,
Please help me to find why I'm seeing slow speeds when KVM guest is on
NFS storage. I have pretty standard setup, running Proxmox 4.1-1. The
storage server is on NFS connected directly (no switches/hubs, direct
NIC-to-NIC connection) via Gigabit ethernet.
I just launched Debian-8.3 stock
12 matches
Mail list logo