Hi Walt,
> apparently, this code never considered that a posted op might complete,
> and so never included a specific case for it. There is a now a specific
> return code for that, but I don't know where to put it since I don't
> really understand the "reposting" thing.
>
> Are one of these act
Hello again,
apparently, this code never considered that a posted op might complete,
and so never included a specific case for it. There is a now a specific
return code for that, but I don't know where to put it since I don't
really understand the "reposting" thing.
Are one of these action
OK, I think I figured out that the request completed without ever
deferring due to a cache hit, so it returned SM_ACTION_TERMINATE and the
client took that as an error. I'm going to have to dig some more and
figure that out, but I'm not sure why the state machine status and not
the actual erro
Hello all - I'm debugging away in the pvfs-client. I start everything
up, do a mount, which seems to work, then do an ls, and it hangs. In
the log I can see a series of GETATTR requests going through the
pvfs-client, until I get to the stuff I've copied here. Its nearly done
with a GETATTR,
Thanks Walt. I'm forwarding your response to dev so that everyone
can benefit. :-)
-sam
Begin forwarded message:
From: "Walter B. Ligon III" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: October 24, 2006 2:52:45 PM CDT
To: Sam Lang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [Pvfs2-developers] threaded client-core and
On Oct 24, 2006, at 1:53 PM, Walter B. Ligon III wrote:
Good. I'm making progress tracking down the problems in the code -
somehow a bunch of edits got lost. I'm fixing them. Involves
changes it all of the client state machines.
BTW, there is one I'm confused about. src/client/sysint/
Good. I'm making progress tracking down the problems in the code -
somehow a bunch of edits got lost. I'm fixing them. Involves changes
it all of the client state machines.
BTW, there is one I'm confused about. src/client/sysint/sys-getattr.sm
the last state action "getattr_set_sys_respon
I'm working with your branch Walt. Most of the code that does
allocation of the client state machines is the same.
-sam
On Oct 24, 2006, at 9:10 AM, Walter B. Ligon III wrote:
Should be careful here, since all of the code dealing with
PINT_client_sm's have been rewritten for the new SM c
Should be careful here, since all of the code dealing with
PINT_client_sm's have been rewritten for the new SM code and Murali's
suggestions (for example) may not work so well.
Walt
Murali Vilayannur wrote:
Hey Sam,
I ran pvfs2-client-core in valgrind, and then ran Bonnie++ a few times
(10)
