[Pvfs2-developers] dspace iterate and MULTIPLE_KEY

2007-05-07 Thread Sam Lang
Hi Phil, With the new changes to dspace_iterate I'm seeing problems where the iterator skips some handles in the dspace db that actually exist. It only shows up if I restart the server after creating a bunch of files (100K or so). This is with the trunk. Essentially, I can create a

[Pvfs2-developers] [PATCH] Xen configure checks addition

2007-05-07 Thread David Brown
This patch is to kernel.m4 and adds the appropriate configure checks to make sure building against a xen kernel works okay. mainly its just adding the #ifdef CONFIG_XEN then include the appropriate files. Thanks, - David Brown --- a/maint/config/kernel.m4 2007-05-07 15:16:42.0 -0700 +++

[Pvfs2-developers] Re: dspace iterate and MULTIPLE_KEY

2007-05-07 Thread Sam Lang
This was being caused by a bug in the new MULTIPLE_KEY code I added to allow faster startup times. I've committed a fix to HEAD. Note that this bug does *not* affect 2.6.3. -sam On May 7, 2007, at 3:12 PM, Sam Lang wrote: Hi Phil, With the new changes to dspace_iterate I'm seeing

Re: [Pvfs2-developers] pvfs2 Quadrics Port?

2007-05-07 Thread Pete Wyckoff
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Mon, 07 May 2007 16:05 -0700: I was wondering if there was any information out there on porting pvfs2 to use quadrics for communication? Any information would be helpful. doc/REFERENCES has: Weikuan Yu, Shuang Liang, Dhabaleswar K. Panda. PVFS2 over Quadrics:

Re: [Pvfs2-developers] [PATCH] Xen configure checks addition

2007-05-07 Thread Pete Wyckoff
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Mon, 07 May 2007 15:29 -0700: This patch is to kernel.m4 and adds the appropriate configure checks to make sure building against a xen kernel works okay. mainly its just adding the #ifdef CONFIG_XEN then include the appropriate files. [..] AC_TRY_COMPILE([

Re: [Pvfs2-developers] [PATCH] Xen configure checks addition

2007-05-07 Thread David Brown
This is ``ick''. Every kernel file that wants to compile with Xen has to include these five lines? Is there a better way to do it? Your goal is admirable, but I can't imagine anyone sane would put up with this requirement. Agreed but this is how I got it to work. For some tests this may be