Sam,
Just a random thought..
Just like our distribution code is pluggable, perhaps the
multi-pathing code can also be (eventually?) moved into a plugin-based
architecture..?
Also I think, instead of using the secondary paths only for failover
scenarios, multi-pathing plugins could define to choose
On Oct 12, 2007, at 4:03 PM, Phil Carns wrote:
This patch is not a bug fix. I doubt that anyone wants this
behavior, but I am sharing the patch just in case. It causes PVFS
to _not_ report an error if a user attempts to set unsupported
sticky or setuid bits on a file or directory. It is
Looks good. I've committed to MAIN. Thanks for the patch Phil.
-sam
On Oct 12, 2007, at 3:49 PM, Phil Carns wrote:
This patch adds a new configuration parameter called
"RootSquashExceptions". It has the same value syntax as the
existing RootSquash parameter, but it allows you to list ho
Committed to MAIN. Thanks Phil!
-sam
On Oct 12, 2007, at 3:58 PM, Phil Carns wrote:
pvfs2-test-aio.patch:
-
This set of test programs allow comparison of normal io (pread/
pwrite) vs. aio vs. alt-aio (as implemented in pvfs2 with the "alt-
aio" trove method). There isn
I discussed the desired behavior we want out of this fail-over code
with folks offline, and we came up with a plan.
At the moment, there are two conflicting failure schemes, multiple
addresses, and multiple protocols. Also, the multiple protocols case
isn't ideal for failure, since both
I think I can get it to do that -- well at least for the english version
of the refuse message:
PlEASE VERIFY that the address described in the rejection is the same
address you attempted to register for the list. Many (many) people
subscribe from an address such as [EMAIL PROTECTED], but send em
Hi Brad,
Does mailman let you stick in some help text in the reject message?
Something telling them to verify that the email they sent from was
the same as the subscribing one?
I don't think its worth trying to be more responsive to list owner
emails. I agree that its too much to handl
There is a registered user: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The mail sent to walt was from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I don't have good answers on how to help users debug this problem as it
can be subtle to detect I guess. Mailing the list owner probably won't
help as those accounts are so swamped with spam that my sp
Walt,
Someone on irc complained recently about not being able to post to
the user's list. It may be that people are sending from addresses
that are different than what they used to subscribe, but since its
happened twice now, can you check and make sure that there aren't a
backlog of em
On Wed, Nov 07, 2007 at 02:25:41PM -0500, Walter B. Ligon III wrote:
> Can anyone help out with this?
>
> Walt
>
> Hi Walt,
>
> It's been awhile since we last spoke. I hope everything is going well!
>
> I'm trying to install PVFS2 on our Apple cluster and I hit a snag. I
> posted the email bel
Can anyone help out with this?
Walt
Hi Walt,
It's been awhile since we last spoke. I hope everything is going well!
I'm trying to install PVFS2 on our Apple cluster and I hit a snag. I
posted the email below to the mailing list, after havinng subscribed but
the message bounced back saying I'
On Nov 7, 2007, at 10:35 AM, Pete Wyckoff wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Wed, 07 Nov 2007 10:19 -0600:
On Nov 7, 2007, at 10:06 AM, Sam Lang wrote:
On Nov 7, 2007, at 7:17 AM, Pete Wyckoff wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Tue, 06 Nov 2007 18:08 -0500:
diff -p -u -r1.88 -r1.89
--- bmi.c
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Wed, 07 Nov 2007 10:19 -0600:
> On Nov 7, 2007, at 10:06 AM, Sam Lang wrote:
> >On Nov 7, 2007, at 7:17 AM, Pete Wyckoff wrote:
> >>[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Tue, 06 Nov 2007 18:08 -0500:
> >>>diff -p -u -r1.88 -r1.89
> >>>--- bmi.c 20 Oct 2007 15:40:13 - 1.88
On Nov 7, 2007, at 10:06 AM, Sam Lang wrote:
On Nov 7, 2007, at 7:17 AM, Pete Wyckoff wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Tue, 06 Nov 2007 18:08 -0500:
diff -p -u -r1.88 -r1.89
--- bmi.c 20 Oct 2007 15:40:13 - 1.88
+++ bmi.c 6 Nov 2007 23:08:33 - 1.89
@@ -214,7
On Nov 7, 2007, at 7:17 AM, Pete Wyckoff wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Tue, 06 Nov 2007 18:08 -0500:
diff -p -u -r1.88 -r1.89
--- bmi.c 20 Oct 2007 15:40:13 - 1.88
+++ bmi.c 6 Nov 2007 23:08:33 - 1.89
@@ -214,7 +214,7 @@ int BMI_initialize(const char *method_
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Tue, 06 Nov 2007 18:08 -0500:
> diff -p -u -r1.88 -r1.89
> --- bmi.c 20 Oct 2007 15:40:13 - 1.88
> +++ bmi.c 6 Nov 2007 23:08:33 - 1.89
> @@ -214,7 +214,7 @@ int BMI_initialize(const char *method_li
> if(!strncmp(listen_addrs[j], p
16 matches
Mail list logo
