[pydotorg-www] Board Resolutions from the March 2012 Board Meeting - Please Post Online

2012-05-10 Thread Pat Campbell
Hi pydotorg team: Could you please add the following board resolutions from the March 2012 board meetings to this web page: http://www.python.org/psf/records/board/resolutions/ Please see the list of board resolutions to be added below: * * *March 26, 2012 board meeting* **RESOLVED**

Re: [pydotorg-www] Final draft of redesign RFP

2012-05-10 Thread Chris Withers
On 10/05/2012 13:47, A.M. Kuchling wrote: The job page could be moved into its own repository -- I would include all the templates and build scripts, too, so that the repository is completely standalone. Yep, I'd be all for this, here seems as good a place as any: https://github.com/cjw296/job

Re: [pydotorg-www] Final draft of redesign RFP

2012-05-10 Thread A.M. Kuchling
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 07:45:04AM +0100, Chris Withers wrote: > How is this going to work with the job board? One major goal of the RFP is to make it easier to create sub-sites; the RFP gives edu.python.org and mentors.python.org as examples, and jobs.python.org would then be another such sub-sit

Re: [pydotorg-www] Final draft of redesign RFP

2012-05-10 Thread Chris Withers
On 10/05/2012 13:10, mar...@v.loewis.de wrote: I'm largely sure that I think the job board should split off into its own microsite at jobs.python.org. How do we go about making that happen? I think I'm -1 on making a subsite. I like URL stability, so even if the content maintenance of the jobs

Re: [pydotorg-www] Final draft of redesign RFP

2012-05-10 Thread martin
I'm largely sure that I think the job board should split off into its own microsite at jobs.python.org. How do we go about making that happen? I think I'm -1 on making a subsite. I like URL stability, so even if the content maintenance of the jobs site works independent from the rest, it shou

Re: [pydotorg-www] Final draft of redesign RFP

2012-05-10 Thread anatoly techtonik
On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 2:20 PM, Michael Foord wrote: > > One of the big problems we have right now is the complexity of the toolchain > and the work required to get new contributors. I'm really hoping the new > system solves this problem. (disclaimer: the text below may hurt feelings, as usual,

Re: [pydotorg-www] Final draft of redesign RFP

2012-05-10 Thread Chris Withers
Hi Andrew, On 09/05/2012 21:54, A.M. Kuchling wrote: First, the draft now envisions the system being initially written by the bidder and then maintenance duties would increasingly be taken over by the site volunteers. How is this going to work with the job board? I'm ambivalent about this. I