When editing pages on the python.org website, it is very difficult
to tell whether edits are correct or not, since it takes ages for
the caches to receive the updates from the Django CMS.
Is there a way, perhaps a special URL, to directly access the
backend system without going through Fastly ?
T
On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 11:55 AM, M.-A. Lemburg wrote:
> When editing pages on the python.org website, it is very difficult
> to tell whether edits are correct or not, since it takes ages for
> the caches to receive the updates from the Django CMS.
>
> Is there a way, perhaps a special URL, to dir
It’s kind of a kludge, but just add a parameter to the URL, like ?foo=12332131
the full URL is used as part of the cache key.
On Jun 2, 2014, at 4:55 AM, M.-A. Lemburg wrote:
> When editing pages on the python.org website, it is very difficult
> to tell whether edits are correct or not, since it
On 02.06.2014 12:48, Donald Stufft wrote:
> It’s kind of a kludge, but just add a parameter to the URL, like
> ?foo=12332131 the full URL is
> used as part of the cache key.
Thanks, this does work, but it would still be better to have
a domain which can be used for testing the edits immediately a
A better solution still would be to use the purge API so that editing a page
purges the cached copy of the page and the update is available to everyone
immediately. This is what PyPI does to allow Fastly to cache things for 1 day
but still have near instant availability of new package uploads and t
On 02.06.2014 13:52, Donald Stufft wrote:
> A better solution still would be to use the purge API so that editing a page
> purges the cached
> copy of the page and the update is available to everyone immediately. This is
> what PyPI does to
> allow Fastly to cache things for 1 day but still have
Oh another handy thing, anyone can purge a single URL from the Fastly cache, it
doesn’t require authentication.
curl -X PURGE https://www.python.org/whatever/
On Jun 2, 2014, at 7:59 AM, M.-A. Lemburg wrote:
> On 02.06.2014 13:52, Donald Stufft wrote:
>> A better solution still would be to use
Barry Warsaw writes:
> On Jun 02, 2014, at 12:39 AM, anatoly techtonik wrote:
>
>>You need to count non-reverted edits before and after the certain date.
>>That's all. And am curious about Mailman - it is clear that for w.p.o there
>>is no stats yet.
>
> I suppose it's possible to get some stats
On 01.06.2014 05:48, Barry Warsaw wrote:
> On May 31, 2014, at 10:49 PM, M.-A. Lemburg wrote:
>
>> I've added a new user group called NewUsersGroup, which does
>> get editing rights, but we'll have to manage this manually and
>> new users who want to receive editing rights will have to write
>> to