Re: [pydotorg-www] FWD: adding a link on the Python download page

2011-10-03 Thread Martin v. Löwis
Am 03.10.2011 09:02, schrieb Chris Withers: > On 02/10/2011 21:58, M.-A. Lemburg wrote: >> Aahz wrote: >>> What do people think? I'm -0 because I've never heard of this before >>> (they haven't been posting to c.l.py.announce) and because they're using >>> 2.7.1 more than three months after 2.7.2

Re: [pydotorg-www] FWD: adding a link on the Python download page

2011-10-03 Thread Martin v. Löwis
Am 01.10.2011 22:03, schrieb Aahz: > What do people think? I'm -0 because I've never heard of this before > (they haven't been posting to c.l.py.announce) and because they're using > 2.7.1 more than three months after 2.7.2 was released. I'm +1. That they care about getting the link posted is eno

Re: [pydotorg-www] FWD: adding a link on the Python download page

2011-10-03 Thread M.-A. Lemburg
Chris Withers wrote: > On 02/10/2011 21:58, M.-A. Lemburg wrote: >> Aahz wrote: >>> What do people think? I'm -0 because I've never heard of this before >>> (they haven't been posting to c.l.py.announce) and because they're using >>> 2.7.1 more than three months after 2.7.2 was released. >> >> I'm

Re: [pydotorg-www] FWD: adding a link on the Python download page

2011-10-03 Thread Chris Withers
On 02/10/2011 21:58, M.-A. Lemburg wrote: Aahz wrote: What do people think? I'm -0 because I've never heard of this before (they haven't been posting to c.l.py.announce) and because they're using 2.7.1 more than three months after 2.7.2 was released. I'm +1 on this. The more options available

Re: [pydotorg-www] FWD: adding a link on the Python download page

2011-10-02 Thread M.-A. Lemburg
Aahz wrote: > What do people think? I'm -0 because I've never heard of this before > (they haven't been posting to c.l.py.announce) and because they're using > 2.7.1 more than three months after 2.7.2 was released. I'm +1 on this. The more options available for the user, the better. BTW: You cou

Re: [pydotorg-www] FWD: adding a link on the Python download page

2011-10-02 Thread Chris Withers
-1 from me, I'd like to see "non standard python distributions" dissuaded... (if companies have a real product (eg: EPD) they don't need python.org's help to promote... Chris On 01/10/2011 21:03, Aahz wrote: What do people think? I'm -0 because I've never heard of this before (they haven't

[pydotorg-www] FWD: adding a link on the Python download page

2011-10-01 Thread Aahz
What do people think? I'm -0 because I've never heard of this before (they haven't been posting to c.l.py.announce) and because they're using 2.7.1 more than three months after 2.7.2 was released. - Forwarded message from Erik Janssens - > Date: Sat, 01 Oct 2011 13:59:15 +0200 > From: E