Thanks for the reply guys, I'll pass this on to the powers that be, but it
sounds like this is prob a dead end.
Are we able to track down the original authors? Is it worth sending a mass
email out to those who've edited this wiki page to get an OK for a fully
free license? I agree, why post code
On Monday 04 March 2013 18:41:50 Justin Rosen wrote:
> Thanks for the reply guys, I'll pass this on to the powers that be, but it
> sounds like this is prob a dead end.
>
> Are we able to track down the original authors? Is it worth sending a mass
> email out to those who've edited this wiki page
On Saturday 02 March 2013 17:08:23 anatoly techtonik wrote:
>
> I think it is fair to put non-HomePage wiki content to CC0 / Public Domain
> unless specified otherwise. If you want to preserve your rights - go
> publish the content in your blog and supply a link. Tracking down authors
> is a useles
On Sat, Mar 2, 2013 at 6:34 PM, Paul Boddie wrote:
> On Saturday 02 March 2013 10:26:14 anatoly techtonik wrote:
> > The license clause is attached to MoinMoin wiki software, the code pieces
> > is a content and are not affected. GPL clause can be removed. It is not
> > needed (as the /moin/ pref
On Saturday 02 March 2013 10:26:14 anatoly techtonik wrote:
> The license clause is attached to MoinMoin wiki software, the code pieces
> is a content and are not affected. GPL clause can be removed. It is not
> needed (as the /moin/ prefix in the URL).
Although the remark about the GPL applying t
The license clause is attached to MoinMoin wiki software, the code pieces
is a content and are not affected. GPL clause can be removed. It is not
needed (as the /moin/ prefix in the URL).
--
anatoly t.
On Sat, Mar 2, 2013 at 12:24 AM, Justin Rosen
wrote:
> What is the licensing on the decorato
What is the licensing on the decorator code snippets found here
http://wiki.python.org/moin/PythonDecoratorLibrary?
The site says GPL, but I wasn't sure if that was the site itself or the
actual code itself.
Thanks!
Justin
___
pydotorg-www mailing list
