On Sun, 7 Sep 2003, John K Luebs wrote:
Currently, pygtk seems to be supporting both Python 2.2 and 2.3. What
does 2.3 have that 2.2 does not have that would warrant ditching support
for 2.2?
Lots of Unicode fixes and some object system cleanups.
To be clear, I am *not* advocating that pygtk
On 07/09/03 14:27, John K Luebs wrote:
Currently, pygtk seems to be supporting both Python 2.2 and 2.3. What
does 2.3 have that 2.2 does not have that would warrant ditching support
for 2.2?
If it ain't broke...
Well, there is one feature found in Python 2.3's C API that could be
useful, and
John K Luebs wrote:
Currently, pygtk seems to be supporting both Python 2.2 and 2.3. What
does 2.3 have that 2.2 does not have that would warrant ditching support
for 2.2?
One small feature that might be nice is that Python 2.3 makes it easy
for types created by C code to have class methods, by
On Wed, 3 Sep 2003, Malcolm Tredinnick wrote:
My only real request is to continue supporting Python 2.2. I was one of
the people in favour of requiring 2.2 early on, so this risks sounding
hypocritical, but the changes between 2.2 and 2.3 are not as large as
from 2.1 to 2.2 and there will be
On 06/09/03 14:58, Andrew P. Lentvorski, Jr. wrote:
On Wed, 3 Sep 2003, Malcolm Tredinnick wrote:
My only real request is to continue supporting Python 2.2. I was one of
the people in favour of requiring 2.2 early on, so this risks sounding
hypocritical, but the changes between 2.2 and 2.3
On Sat, 6 Sep 2003, James Henstridge wrote:
Since when will GTK 2.4 break binary compatibility?
Well, I think my impression about that came from discussions originating
in this thread where Owen talks about new API in 2.4:
http://www.geocrawler.com/mail/msg.php3?msg_id=10282211list=521
On Wed, 2003-09-03 at 19:19, James Henstridge wrote:
On 3/09/2003 9:50 AM, Malcolm Tredinnick wrote:
[...]
What do you think about moving the gtksourceview bindings into the main
module (I'm not sure where exactly in the directory tree)? This is all
said without having talked to the maintainer
I have just branched pygtk, pyorbit and gnome-python in CVS. If you
want to get the 2.0 branches, you will need to switch your branches over
to the branches:
cd pygtk; cvs update -r pygtk-2-0 .
cd pyorbit; cvs update -r pyorbit-2-0 .
cd gnome-python; cvs update -r gnome-python-2-0 .
On Wed, 2003-09-03 at 00:46, James Henstridge wrote:
I have just branched pygtk, pyorbit and gnome-python in CVS. If you
want to get the 2.0 branches, you will need to switch your branches over
to the branches:
cd pygtk; cvs update -r pygtk-2-0 .
cd pyorbit; cvs update -r
On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 11:50:41AM +1000, Malcolm Tredinnick wrote:
Any comments?
My only real request is to continue supporting Python 2.2. I was one of
Seconded, for similar reasons as Malcolm's.
Take care,
--
Christian Reis, Senior Engineer, Async Open Source, Brazil.
10 matches
Mail list logo
