On Mon, Jul 5, 2010 at 15:22, John Stowers wrote:
>
>> > I just sent a mail to the python-hackers list with some of my queries.
>>
>> Replying here as well as application authors will be interested.
>
> Cool.
>
>>
>> > But my concerns are basically
>> >
>> > * What is the state of the more advance
On 07/03/2010 01:24 AM, John Stowers wrote:
On Thu, 2010-07-01 at 15:33 +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 15:13, John Stowers wrote:
On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 6:52 PM, Jason Heeris wrote:
I'm trying to get a PyGTK app going on a Windows XP installation. It
requires PyGTK 2.17. I
>
> This seems a little soft. Please do not take offence, but can this
> please be treated with similar stability guarantees and respect as gtk+
> - if your commit breaks backwards compatibility with no warning then it
> will be reverted.
Sorry,
s/will/should
I'm not the boss!
John
>
> Rega
> > I just sent a mail to the python-hackers list with some of my queries.
>
> Replying here as well as application authors will be interested.
Cool.
>
> > But my concerns are basically
> >
> > * What is the state of the more advanced GObject features in PyGI
> >- _gsignals_, interface imp
