Hello,
On 6/6/07, Johan Dahlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
My employer (Async Open Source) recently invested in server for faster
hosting. I just moved over the PyGTK FAQ to the new server, it should be a
lot more responsive now.
Just to thank you and your employer for hosting this FAQ!
It cont
Pádraig Brady wrote:
Johan Dahlin wrote:
Hi there
My employer (Async Open Source) recently invested in server for faster
hosting. I just moved over the PyGTK FAQ to the new server, it should be a
lot more responsive now.
The DNS records has not been updated yet so it is temporary redirected
Johan Dahlin wrote:
> Hi there
>
> My employer (Async Open Source) recently invested in server for faster
> hosting. I just moved over the PyGTK FAQ to the new server, it should be a
> lot more responsive now.
> The DNS records has not been updated yet so it is temporary redirected to
> pygtk-faq.
Hi there
My employer (Async Open Source) recently invested in server for faster
hosting. I just moved over the PyGTK FAQ to the new server, it should be a
lot more responsive now.
The DNS records has not been updated yet so it is temporary redirected to
pygtk-faq.async.com.br
Let me know if there
On 27/08/2003 7:47 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi again,
The sequence API as described in the pygtk FAQ entry 13.25
http://www.async.com.br/faq/pygtk/index.py?req=show&file=faq13.025.htp
does not work, the TreeStore and ListStore objects do have
a function __getitem__, but no __setitem__. Wher
Hi again,
The sequence API as described in the pygtk FAQ entry 13.25
http://www.async.com.br/faq/pygtk/index.py?req=show&file=faq13.025.htp
does not work, the TreeStore and ListStore objects do have
a function __getitem__, but no __setitem__. Where has
__setitem__ gone?
pygtk-1.99.15 on win32,
>> I think having a 1.2 vs. 1.3 section might be a good idea as well.
Christian> Fine by me, but since we don't have subsections, how do you
Christian> propose we separate the "namespaces" since we have widgets
Christian> with the same name in 1.2 and 1.3?
I was thinking more ab
On Mon, 28 Jan 2002, Skip Montanaro wrote:
> I think having a 1.2 vs. 1.3 section might be a good idea as well. If
> nothing else, it might get people to realize the API has changed
> significantly.
Fine by me, but since we don't have subsections, how do you propose we
separate the "namespaces"
Christian> Sounds reasonable. Would you (anybody, really) have a
Christian> suggestion of sections for us? Right now I have:
Christian> 1. General Information and Availability
Christian> 2. Widget Issues
Christian> 3. Themes and Styles
Christian> 4. Signal handling
Ch
On Mon, 28 Jan 2002, Skip Montanaro wrote:
> One thing that might help to generate more input and to lessen your load is
> to add questions without answers when you realize they are faqs (should be a
> lot lower effort on your part than trying to come up with answers as well).
> Every now and aga
> Skip Montanaro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
> >> Where is the faq ...
>
> Christian> I'm working on one in my spare time (which is why it is still
> Christian> so short) at http://www.async.com.br/faq/pygtk/
>
> Christian,
>
> One thing that might help to generate more input a
>> Where is the faq ...
Christian> I'm working on one in my spare time (which is why it is still
Christian> so short) at http://www.async.com.br/faq/pygtk/
Christian,
One thing that might help to generate more input and to lessen your load is
to add questions without answers when y
On Mon, 21 Jan 2002, Markus Schaber wrote:
> > 1)Where is the faq or basic documentation, such as a listing of modules
> > and a package/module hierarchy? From digging through the archive, I'm
> > guessing not.
>
> For python, you should find this on www.python.org.
>
> For gtk, www.gtk.org has
13 matches
Mail list logo
