On Sex, 2007-03-09 at 11:05 -0500, John Dennis wrote:
On Fri, 2007-03-09 at 10:38 -0500, John Dennis wrote:
On Fri, 2007-03-09 at 08:10 -0700, Jeffrey Barish wrote:
Gustavo J. A. M. Carneiro wrote:
Another, more complex, example can be found here:
Gustavo J. A. M. Carneiro wrote:
Another, more complex, example can be found here:
http://telecom.inescporto.pt/~gjc/higcontainer/higcontainer.py
By studying the examples, I have learned a lot about subclassing. I have
two questions about this example. It seems desirable to me that it be
On Sáb, 2007-03-10 at 09:54 -0700, Jeffrey Barish wrote:
Gustavo J. A. M. Carneiro wrote:
Another, more complex, example can be found here:
http://telecom.inescporto.pt/~gjc/higcontainer/higcontainer.py
By studying the examples, I have learned a lot about subclassing. I have
two
Gustavo J. A. M. Carneiro wrote:
Another, more complex, example can be found here:
http://telecom.inescporto.pt/~gjc/higcontainer/higcontainer.py
Thanks to everyone for the examples. Is there documentation anywhere on the
do_ methods that they all contain? I guess that when a Widget receives
On Fri, 2007-03-09 at 08:10 -0700, Jeffrey Barish wrote:
Gustavo J. A. M. Carneiro wrote:
Another, more complex, example can be found here:
http://telecom.inescporto.pt/~gjc/higcontainer/higcontainer.py
Thanks to everyone for the examples. Is there documentation anywhere on the
do_
On Fri, 2007-03-09 at 10:38 -0500, John Dennis wrote:
On Fri, 2007-03-09 at 08:10 -0700, Jeffrey Barish wrote:
Gustavo J. A. M. Carneiro wrote:
Another, more complex, example can be found here:
http://telecom.inescporto.pt/~gjc/higcontainer/higcontainer.py
Thanks to everyone for
John Dennis wrote:
Could it be that 'do_' method naming is not subclassing but rather
auto-magic signal connecting via method naming convention? Either way, I
never did find any documentation on it.
It could be, but is not the case. do_*() methods *do* override default
class handlers.
Paul
