Hi, from what I can see, it looks like gnomekeyring bindings are very incomplete. Basically only the specialised functions (*_network_password_* and friends) are bound, and all the generic mechanisms (password functions other than network_password, schema manipulation, etc.) are inaccessible. Is that true?
I'm writing an Epy extension to interface with GMail, and wanted to store passwords in the keyring. I *could* mangle it into the network_password structure by doing something silly like setting the protocol to 'gmail', but it feels wrong. Well, actually I guess it might even be beneficial if you happen to have passwords for http://mail.google.com already saved, but the question remains: why are the python bindings so limited? Not all data you might want to store fits into the schema of network password, and that's as true in C as it is in Python. Cheers, Maciej _______________________________________________ pygtk mailing list pygtk@daa.com.au http://www.daa.com.au/mailman/listinfo/pygtk Read the PyGTK FAQ: http://www.async.com.br/faq/pygtk/
