Re: [pygtk] moving some stuff from pygobject to pygtk

2010-08-25 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On 08/25/2010 01:22 PM, John Stowers wrote: On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 9:08 PM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 22:37, John Palmieri wrote: Hmm, seems my original e-mail never made it to the list. Thanks for posting this Tomeu. - "John Stowers" wrote: On Fri, 2010-08-20 at

Re: [pygtk] moving some stuff from pygobject to pygtk

2010-08-25 Thread John Stowers
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 9:08 PM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: > On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 22:37, John Palmieri wrote: >> Hmm, seems my original e-mail never made it to the list.  Thanks for posting >> this Tomeu. >> >> - "John Stowers" wrote: >> >>> On Fri, 2010-08-20 at 17:54 +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrot

Re: [pygtk] moving some stuff from pygobject to pygtk

2010-08-25 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 22:37, John Palmieri wrote: > Hmm, seems my original e-mail never made it to the list.  Thanks for posting > this Tomeu. > > - "John Stowers" wrote: > >> On Fri, 2010-08-20 at 17:54 +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: >> > Hi all, >> > >> > as you may know J5 is working on the

Re: [pygtk] moving some stuff from pygobject to pygtk

2010-08-25 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 02:13, John Stowers wrote: > On Fri, 2010-08-20 at 17:54 +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: >> I know that pygtk doesn't have an excess of maintainers right now, but >> these modules should be relatively mature already. > > Agree. I was one of the first large-scale users of the GIO

Re: [pygtk] moving some stuff from pygobject to pygtk

2010-08-21 Thread John Palmieri
Hmm, seems my original e-mail never made it to the list. Thanks for posting this Tomeu. - "John Stowers" wrote: > On Fri, 2010-08-20 at 17:54 +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > as you may know J5 is working on the Python3 port of PyGObject and > he > > has found that porting t

Re: [pygtk] moving some stuff from pygobject to pygtk

2010-08-20 Thread John Stowers
On Fri, 2010-08-20 at 17:54 +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: > Hi all, > > as you may know J5 is working on the Python3 port of PyGObject and he > has found that porting the gio static bindings is a lot of work and > somewhat useless as the rest of the static bindings aren't likely to > be ported to Pyt

[pygtk] moving some stuff from pygobject to pygtk

2010-08-20 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
Hi all, as you may know J5 is working on the Python3 port of PyGObject and he has found that porting the gio static bindings is a lot of work and somewhat useless as the rest of the static bindings aren't likely to be ported to Python 3 at all. I would like to put for consideration the idea of mo