Hello,
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 8:13 PM, Chris McDonough wrote:
> I'm considering making a fairly major terminology change to the Pyramid
> docs. I'd like to consider renaming the term "model" to "resource" in
> the docs.
I think "resource" term isn't suitable for this kind of thing, as
being po
Am 16.12.2010 09:59 schrieb Andrey Popp:
How about term "location"? I think it's more suitable:
This sounds reasonable to me as somebody who has not yet used Pyramid
and is not yet aquainted with its functionality.
I don't like the term "model" because it is confusing for people coming
from
While it seems people generally agree that some change is required here,
it also seems there are a good number of people who don't like
"resource". Here are the arguments against it:
- we're just switching one overloaded term ("model") for another
("resource"). Zope people tend to think of sta
Hi
On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 12:05 AM, Chris McDonough wrote:
> While it seems people generally agree that some change is required here,
> it also seems there are a good number of people who don't like
> "resource". Here are the arguments against it:
>
> - we're just switching one overloaded term
On Fri, 2010-12-17 at 00:08 -0200, Fernando Correa Neto wrote:
> Hi
>
> On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 12:05 AM, Chris McDonough wrote:
> > While it seems people generally agree that some change is required here,
> > it also seems there are a good number of people who don't like
> > "resource". Here ar
In my opinion, a resource applies to the non-livable content such as
images, videos, audios, dialog templates, icons, css/js scripts where
those files cannot be executed within the program domain but very much
useful within the domain like file rendering, file serving purpose.
Again model tends to
On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 12:13 AM, Chris McDonough wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-12-17 at 00:08 -0200, Fernando Correa Neto wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 12:05 AM, Chris McDonough wrote:
>> > While it seems people generally agree that some change is required here,
>> > it also seems there are
Other names "WebObject" or "WebNode". It could be a Url or any object
Pyramid supported.
On Dec 17, 7:57 am, Fernando Correa Neto wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 12:13 AM, Chris McDonough wrote:
> > On Fri, 2010-12-17 at 00:08 -0200, Fernando Correa Neto wrote:
> >> Hi
>
> >> On Fri, Dec 17,
So, I will confess to being the one who asked for this change, and
while I'm definitely open to other options, I think resource is a good
term for items in the graph. The graph itself I'm not sure what to
call, but I think model is confusing because it is too easy to confuse
with a "domain model"
On Thu, 2010-12-16 at 23:57 -0500, Mark Ramm wrote:
> So, I will confess to being the one who asked for this change, and
> while I'm definitely open to other options, I think resource is a good
> term for items in the graph. The graph itself I'm not sure what to
> call, but I think model is confus
10 matches
Mail list logo