Re: Wanted: HTML tag generator for WebHelpers2

2013-07-03 Thread Tres Seaver
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 07/03/2013 11:12 PM, Mike Orr wrote: > The thing is, WebHelpers has always tried to avoid dependencies so > that it can be used in the widest variety of use cases. It now > depends on MarkupSafe because that's a small best-of-breed security > enh

Re: Wanted: HTML tag generator for WebHelpers2

2013-07-03 Thread Mike Orr
On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 11:09 AM, Jason McKellar wrote: > On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 12:46 PM, Mike Orr wrote: >> Maybe I should just ask the list: is lxml suitable as a tag generator >> for webhelpers2.html? Or is it too big for a general-purpose library, >> not everyone of which will be generating H

Re: Wanted: HTML tag generator for WebHelpers2

2013-07-03 Thread Wichert Akkerman
On Jul 3, 2013, at 21:53, Tres Seaver wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 07/03/2013 02:09 PM, Jason McKellar wrote: > >> I may be in the minority about dependencies, but I really don't mind >> have extra dependencies if they are the right tool. It doesn't hurt >> t

Re: Wanted: HTML tag generator for WebHelpers2

2013-07-03 Thread Tres Seaver
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 07/03/2013 02:09 PM, Jason McKellar wrote: > I may be in the minority about dependencies, but I really don't mind > have extra dependencies if they are the right tool. It doesn't hurt > that I use lxml in most of my Pyramid applications anyway. I

Re: Wanted: HTML tag generator for WebHelpers2

2013-07-03 Thread Jason McKellar
On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 12:46 PM, Mike Orr wrote: > On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 12:46 AM, Mike Orr wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 11:48 PM, Wichert Akkerman > wrote: > >> > >> On Jun 28, 2013, at 23:04 , Mike Orr wrote: > >> > >> I'm thinking about rewriting the low-level HTML tag generator in >