Re: is the current sqlalchemy scaffold 'correct' ?

2013-07-25 Thread Jonathan Vanasco
On Tuesday, July 23, 2013 2:52:32 AM UTC-4, Laurence Rowe wrote: > > I've not used the scaffold myself, but invalidation is handled by > zope.sqlalchemy which ties SQLAlchemy into Pyramid's request lifecycle with > pyramid_tm. > i didn't realize that pyramid_tm was in the environment.ini; than

Re: is the current sqlalchemy scaffold 'correct' ?

2013-07-22 Thread Laurence Rowe
Responses inline. On Monday, 15 July 2013 14:14:04 UTC-7, Jonathan Vanasco wrote: > > > Someone posted a docs suggestion to -devel, which made me look at the > current sqlalchemy scaffold. > > > I'm not sure it's 'correct' > > > a few weeks ago I asked Mike Bayer (sqlalchemy) what the best prac

is the current sqlalchemy scaffold 'correct' ?

2013-07-15 Thread Jonathan Vanasco
Someone posted a docs suggestion to -devel, which made me look at the current sqlalchemy scaffold. I'm not sure it's 'correct' a few weeks ago I asked Mike Bayer (sqlalchemy) what the best practices for webapps were ( https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/sqlalchemy/ZsHxDzlATCQ ) he r