On Jan 23, 2009, at 10:19 PM, Jan Koprowski wrote:
IMHO present documentations composed into site lite is a bad idea.
Standard Sphinx generated site was better: more coherent, looks nicer.
Contrast between white documentations background and brown layout is
too high for me, I can't read documen
Hi !
IMHO present documentations composed into site lite is a bad idea.
Standard Sphinx generated site was better: more coherent, looks nicer.
Contrast between white documentations background and brown layout is
too high for me, I can't read documentation. My eyes is tortured. IMHO
leaving docs
On 24/01/2009, at 2:02 PM, Mike Orr wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 5:51 PM, Chris Miles
> wrote:
>
>> I'd like to see the Pylons "quickstart" template offer an
>> authentication/authorization solution as an option, in the same way
>> that it offers a DB/ORM solution (SQLAlchemy) so the us
On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 5:51 PM, Chris Miles wrote:
> I'd like to see the Pylons "quickstart" template offer an
> authentication/authorization solution as an option, in the same way
> that it offers a DB/ORM solution (SQLAlchemy) so the user can get
> started quickly. Many people will be happy
On 24/01/2009, at 8:34 AM, Mike Orr wrote:
> repoze.who solves the authentication issue, which as you say is both
> the biggest security concern and the mos standardized problem (how
> convenient).
>
> repoze.what can handle authorization for at least some sites, but I'm
> not sure how finished
On Friday January 23, 2009 22:34:25 Mike Orr wrote:
> repoze.what can handle authorization for at least some sites, but I'm
> not sure how finished it is.
Out-of-the-box, repoze.what v1 supports the groups/permissions authorization
pattern like AuthKit, but allows you to store such groups/permis
On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 1:13 PM, Christopher Barker
wrote:
>
> Ben Bangert wrote:
>
>> There is no auth in Pylons, its beyond the scope.
>
> I think I agree, but a note:
>
>> Pretty much every site I've built has stored users differently, some
>> have permissions, some just use groups, some just
Ben Bangert wrote:
> There is no auth in Pylons, its beyond the scope.
I think I agree, but a note:
> Pretty much every site I've built has stored users differently, some
> have permissions, some just use groups, some just use permissions.
To be clear -- Authentication and Authorization are t
Tom Longson (nym) wrote:
> I'm worried about the state of authentication in pylons. I don't know
> what I'd recommend to someone else for authentication if they were to
> start building something, and I think this is a big stumbling point
> with pylons as a web framework. I understand not everyone
On Jan 23, 2009, at 9:22 AM, Tom Longson (nym) wrote:
I'm worried about the state of authentication in pylons. I don't know
what I'd recommend to someone else for authentication if they were to
start building something, and I think this is a big stumbling point
with pylons as a web framework. I
I think Pylons should only support Authentication as in http auth that
is supported by Apache/Nginx/Etc , and things like mod_auth / ldap /
etc.
It would be nice if it supported some sort of tie-in with services
that proxy to/from it to make that auth persist.
But everything else that people do
On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 2:31 AM, cropr wrote:
>
> I want to add some administrative console tools next to my 0.9.7
> Pylons application (e.g. a backup/restore). I want to make use of
> some parameter settings in the development.ini or production.ini,
> but I don't need any wsgi stuff. What is t
mk wrote:
> Somewhat off topic, where I work (software group at big IT corporation)
> there is lots and lots of resistance towards dynamic typing. It *is*
> felt that dynamic typing, even in the model of strong dynamic typing of
> Python, belongs precisely to the realm of "hobbyist languages li
+1 I agree.
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 11:53 PM, Marcus Cavanaugh <
marcuscavana...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Jan 19, 10:24 pm, Graham Dumpleton
> wrote:
> > I would agree that need to start looking towards WSGI 2.0 and Python
> > 3.0 would be a good trigger for that.
>
> +1 on that. If there was ev
I'm worried about the state of authentication in pylons. I don't know
what I'd recommend to someone else for authentication if they were to
start building something, and I think this is a big stumbling point
with pylons as a web framework. I understand not everyone wants
authentication, but it is
On Fri, 2009-01-23 at 07:05 -0800, Michael Bayer wrote:
> The only price Pylons is paying is it assumes the developer would like
> to consider how his application should be architected, instead of
> those decisions being made implicitly and invisibly. This is a
> cultural situation created by t
well put.
On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 10:05 AM, Michael Bayer wrote:
>
> what a strange post. There are no "unicode" issues in WSGI, and the
> usage of WSGI in the generic sense doesn't complicate things to any
> degree - the spec is just a single function call.If there are Py3K
> issues in Pas
what a strange post. There are no "unicode" issues in WSGI, and the
usage of WSGI in the generic sense doesn't complicate things to any
degree - the spec is just a single function call.If there are Py3K
issues in Paste, lets first make it clear that *every* application
that deals explicitly w
On Jan 19, 2009, at 8:05 PM, Mike Orr wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 4:05 PM, walterbyrd
> wrote:
>>
>> And if so, why?
>
> Everybody who uses Pylons knows that other frameworks exist and had
> maybe tried one or two others, but has made a conscious choice that
> they like Pylons' style bette
I was just responding to other people's posts, and I'm not the only
person to ever criticize python (while still acknoledging its
strengths).
On Jan 23, 1:45 am, Alberto Valverde wrote:
> Mike Orr wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 9:43 PM, Tycon wrote:
>
> >> Python is so messed up, the only e
On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 12:05 PM, przemek.ch wrote:
>
> I'm getting an error while trying to get sources from svn co
> http://routes.groovie.org/svn/trunk routes
>
> svn: Server sent unexpected return value (405 Method Not Allowed) in
> response to PROPFIND request for '/svn/trunk'
Routes is in
Try from bitbucket: http://bitbucket.org/bbangert/routes/
On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 12:05 PM, przemek.ch wrote:
>
> I'm getting an error while trying to get sources from svn co
> http://routes.groovie.org/svn/trunk routes
>
> svn: Server sent unexpected return value (405 Method Not Allowed) in
> r
I'm getting an error while trying to get sources from svn co
http://routes.groovie.org/svn/trunk routes
svn: Server sent unexpected return value (405 Method Not Allowed) in
response to PROPFIND request for '/svn/trunk'
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this messag
Mike Orr wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 9:43 PM, Tycon wrote:
>
>> Python is so messed up, the only explanation is that the people making
>> it up are blindly following misguided principles.
>>
>
> Since it's so easy to make a web framework in Python, why don't you
> make your own and t
Previously Mike Orr wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 12:31 AM, cropr wrote:
> > I want to add some administrative console tools next to my 0.9.7
> > Pylons application (e.g. a backup/restore). I want to make use of
> > some parameter settings in the development.ini or production.ini,
> > but I d
Thanks
That is what I am looking for
cropr
On 23 jan, 10:03, Mike Orr wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 12:31 AM, cropr wrote:
>
> > I want to add some administrative console tools next to my 0.9.7
> > Pylons application (e.g. a backup/restore). I want to make use of
> > some parameter settings
On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 12:31 AM, cropr wrote:
>
> I want to add some administrative console tools next to my 0.9.7
> Pylons application (e.g. a backup/restore). I want to make use of
> some parameter settings in the development.ini or production.ini,
> but I don't need any wsgi stuff. What is
I want to add some administrative console tools next to my 0.9.7
Pylons application (e.g. a backup/restore). I want to make use of
some parameter settings in the development.ini or production.ini,
but I don't need any wsgi stuff. What is the best and easiest way to
start up the console applicati
On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 9:43 PM, Tycon wrote:
>
> Python is so messed up, the only explanation is that the people making
> it up are blindly following misguided principles.
Since it's so easy to make a web framework in Python, why don't you
make your own and then you won't have to suffer the egr
29 matches
Mail list logo
