Re: beaker configuration

2011-11-19 Thread Michael Merickel
I just pushed out 0.6.1, please let me know if that solves your 1.6 issues. -- Michael -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pylons-discuss" group. To post to this group, send email to pylons-discuss@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, sen

Re: beaker configuration

2011-11-19 Thread Mattias
I reverted to beaker 1.5.4 for now by using easy_install -mxN beaker easy_install beaker==1.5.4 and then removed the Beaker-1.6.1-py2.7.egg folder from the site-lib. On Nov 19, 12:45 pm, Mattias wrote: > Is this still the case? Right now the requirements for pyramid_beaker > is "beaker" so easy

Re: beaker configuration

2011-11-19 Thread Mattias
Is this still the case? Right now the requirements for pyramid_beaker is "beaker" so easy_install pulls in the latest beaker which is "Beaker 1.6.1" On Nov 14, 10:25 pm, Michael Merickel wrote: > Don't upgrade to 1.6 quite yet. pyramid_beaker doesn't support it until its > next release which I h

Re: Multiple transactions within request

2011-11-19 Thread Chris Withers
On 15/11/2011 01:57, Vlad K. wrote: Currently my only choice is abandoning Transaction and writing my own tween to properly commit or rollback the transaction in uncaught exceptions -- basically rewrite pyramid_tm not to use Transaction. A pyramid_sa_tm would likely be something that a lot of