On Sunday, 9 March 2014 04:46:56 UTC-7, Chris Withers wrote:
>
> What are the things you should consider when deciding between waitress
> and mod_wsgi when it comes to serving a pyramid app?
>
If you need to run more than one process, or configure SSL, etc. then
mod_wsgi is the all-in-one soluti
I would go with waitress at this point unless you have to support non-WSGI
applications. It is very efficient and stable and doesn't require you to
run it behind a proxy server (varnish/nginx) if you don't want to.
The only way to get comparable performance from another Python webserver
would be t
We've been building a fairly large system for the past 2 years. Hopefully
going into public beta soon. It deals with a lot of the same concepts as
you're talking about. We've got a website, a twisted daemon and a celery
daemon.
The big tip I can give you is to consider how much you'd like th
Could you use nginx + uwsgi/gunicorn/etc ?
I'm generally anti-Apache because I don't like the memory/process
management model and miscellaneous concurrency issues ( handling the
number, and also dealing with slow connections/hangups ). If you ran
mod_wsgi, I would make really suggest you eithe
On 03/09/2014 04:20 AM, Chris Withers wrote:
Hi All,
So, one of the projects I'm playing with at the moment is a big ball
of asynchronous networking (tonnes of protocols, some tcp, some
multicast) which I want to stick a webapi onto (normal requests +
websocket).
What's the best way to buil
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/09/2014 07:43 AM, Chris Withers wrote:
>> Whatever you do, keep your fingers off asyncore, that’s a complete
>> turd unfortunately (hence tulip).
>
> Well, okay, but it's been used as the core of waitress, which is a
> relatively recent innova
Hi All,
What are the things you should consider when deciding between waitress
and mod_wsgi when it comes to serving a pyramid app?
cheers,
Chris
--
Simplistix - Content Management, Batch Processing & Python Consulting
- http://www.simplistix.co.uk
--
You received this message be
On 09/03/2014 11:31, Hynek Schlawack wrote:
On 9 Mar 2014, at 12:20, Chris Withers wrote:
Aside from that, what's people's experience/recommendations when it comes to
the plethora of async stuff currently available?
twisted, tornado, tulip or even good old fashioned asyncore seem like
possibi
On 9 Mar 2014, at 12:20, Chris Withers wrote:
> Aside from that, what's people's experience/recommendations when it comes to
> the plethora of async stuff currently available?
> twisted, tornado, tulip or even good old fashioned asyncore seem like
> possibilities, I'm wondering which way to go
Hi All,
So, one of the projects I'm playing with at the moment is a big ball of
asynchronous networking (tonnes of protocols, some tcp, some multicast)
which I want to stick a webapi onto (normal requests + websocket).
What's the best way to build the web side of this? I think I'd like to
us
10 matches
Mail list logo
