Shouldn't this part:
require(["dojo/fx", "dojo/dom", "dojo/domReady!"], function(dom, fx) {
be:
require(["dojo/fx", "dojo/dom", "dojo/domReady!"], function(fx, dom) {
i.e. you have to match the order of the function params with the requires?
On Wednesday, May 9, 2012 7:19:36 PM UTC-
de
green-thread safe.
On Thursday, April 12, 2012 2:42:00 PM UTC-7, mike bayer wrote:
>
>
> On Apr 12, 2012, at 3:27 PM, binadam wrote:
>
> On Thursday, April 12, 2012 12:24:42 PM UTC-7, binadam wrote:
>>
>> Hello all,
>>
>> I used the following c
On Thursday, April 12, 2012 12:24:42 PM UTC-7, binadam wrote:
>
> Hello all,
>
> I used the following cookbook for an asynchronous setup:
>
>
> http://michael.merickel.org/2011/6/21/tictactoe-and-long-polling-with-pyramid/
>
>
> but ran into problems.
>
>
Hello all,
I used the following cookbook for an asynchronous setup:
http://michael.merickel.org/2011/6/21/tictactoe-and-long-polling-with-pyramid/
but ran into problems.
First I'd be interested to know if anyone has successfully done this (in
production environment) using the following packa
I'm using pyramid_socketio in one of my apps (not in production yet).
I was wondering if anyone has insight into sockect.io vs sockjs, or if
you have looked at pyramid_socketio & see benefit in moving to
pyramid_sockjs.
Thanks.
On Feb 2, 9:56 am, Nikolay Kim wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've implemented
On Feb 1, 12:21 pm, cd34 wrote:
> On Jan 31, 1:03 am, binadam wrote:
>
> > Does pyramid_rpc.jsonrpc only accept 2.0 requests? when i use android-
> > json-rpc client to make rpc call i get JsonRpcRequestInvalid
> > exception, so I'm guessing android client is se
I hope this is the right place for my question:
Does pyramid_rpc.jsonrpc only accept 2.0 requests? when i use android-
json-rpc client to make rpc call i get JsonRpcRequestInvalid
exception, so I'm guessing android client is sending v1.0 requests
(must admit I don't know difference between version
i ended up using wtforms. definitely check it out (http://
wtforms.simplecodes.com/) if you want validation, widgets & control
over layout, etc
On Jan 29, 7:21 pm, BruceC wrote:
> Thanks to everyone for contributing to this discussion. I guess I
> should summarize my findings, for the sake of any
there's also amazon ec2..
On Mar 29, 9:37 am, "Brian O'Connor" wrote:
> I can't recommend webfaction enough. They've been great. Awesome support,
> good pricing and they work for a wide variety of technology.
>
> I have no affiliation with them, just a happy customer of 2 years.
> On Mar 29, 2011
