Re: [pylons-discuss] Re: plaster 0.3 and plaster_pastedeploy 0.1

I am one of the active maintainers of Gunicorn. I've worked a lot with Pyramid and reviewed or written many of the changes to Gunicorn's support for Paster over the last couple years. I wanted to chime in mostly to say that I'm following along, but I haven't had a chance to figure out exactly

Re: [pylons-discuss] Re: plaster 0.3 and plaster_pastedeploy 0.1

On Wednesday, April 19, 2017 at 1:40:13 PM UTC-4, Michael Merickel wrote: > > > Thanks - I have not. I imagine they would depend on plaster instead of > pastedeploy and then advise people to install the appropriate binding for > whatever wsgi config format they are using... Such as

Re: [pylons-discuss] Re: plaster 0.3 and plaster_pastedeploy 0.1

On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 11:56 AM, Jonathan Vanasco wrote: > this looks pretty great. have you spoken with the maintainers of uwsgi / > gunicorn / etc about plaster support yet? > Thanks - I have not. I imagine they would depend on plaster instead of pastedeploy and then

[pylons-discuss] Re: plaster 0.3 and plaster_pastedeploy 0.1

this looks pretty great. have you spoken with the maintainers of uwsgi / gunicorn / etc about plaster support yet? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pylons-discuss" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an