Coming from the Rails world where FastCGI is a pariah and should be
avoided at all costs, Pylons documentation seems to advocate FastCGI
as the "way" to deploy. Have I missed something, is FastCGI not as
slow and unstable as it was in the past? Have the docs. just not
caught up with what is curr
On Mar 28, 11:01 am, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Coming from the Rails world where FastCGI is a pariah and should be
> avoided at all costs, Pylons documentation seems to advocate FastCGI
> as the "way" to deploy. Have I missed something, is FastCGI not as
> slow and unstable
On Mar 28, 9:01 pm, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Coming from the Rails world where FastCGI is a pariah and should be
> avoided at all costs, Pylons documentation seems to advocate FastCGI
> as the "way" to deploy. Have I missed something, is FastCGI not as
> slow and unstabl
