On 20 February 2010 15:53, Mike Orr sluggos...@gmail.com wrote:
- ``mod_wsgi`` has, and ``CherryPy`` will have, options to handle
the headers in multiple ways (bytestrings vs Unicode), so that they'll
work with whatever the final spec is (or whatever the user wants).
No, mod_wsgi 3.X does not
Howdy!
I've written up a semi-radical proposal to replace Pylons' WSGI stack with a
WebOb-based stack, so this will also be among the discussions. With the
impasse on getting WSGI to Python 3, some of us are impatient to just go our
own direction, and we may want to jump to a higher-level
Here's a summary of the open space, as much as I remember.
Ben discussed the state of Pylons, Chris BFG, Jorge TurboGears, Robert
CherryPy, Ian WebOb/Paste, one guy with a brand-new framework called
We, and another guy with his own web code. There were several Pylons
users, three BFG, and two
On 2/17/10 6:20 PM, Mike Orr wrote:
Last year at PyCon there were several Open Space sessions dedicated to
WSGI framework issues and virtualenv, plus the large WSGI sprint.
These were quite successful so we're trying to do the same this year.
These are targeted to anyone interested in framework
On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 5:20 PM, Mike Orr sluggos...@gmail.com wrote:
I've written up a semi-radical proposal to replace Pylons' WSGI stack
with a WebOb-based stack, so this will also be among the discussions.
With the impasse on getting WSGI to Python 3, some of us are impatient
to just go
Last year at PyCon there were several Open Space sessions dedicated to
WSGI framework issues and virtualenv, plus the large WSGI sprint.
These were quite successful so we're trying to do the same this year.
These are targeted to anyone interested in framework development,
whether you're an
