Widgets

http://www.teenwag.com/widget --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pylons-discuss" group. To post to this group, send email to pylons-discuss@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email t

widgets

Hi Please, advise some widget framework to use with Pylons, I know there is in turbogears. I'd like to here some recommendations before I start learning Toscawidgets because it's only alpha stage now. Maybe there are more mature/promising widget frameworks suitable for Pylons. -- Best regard

Pylons widgets...?

We are starting to build out our templates for a new project. I would like to leverage all the ninja widget functionality in Pylons. Should I be using the toscaWidget stuff? If so I assume I should use some of the tutorials off the Pylons documentation site..? Thanks, -- kevin --~--~-

Re: widgets

Pylons. In the Python world, ToscaWidgets is your only option. However, if you forsake the idea of eggifying things, you can just use various JavaScript widget libraries. Both Dojo and yui-ext have nice looking widgets. Best Regards, -jj -- http

Re: Pylons widgets...?

tutorials off the Pylons > documentation site..? last time I heard TW only had templates for mako and genshi, so you will have to stick to those engines, and yes it is a decent solution for html widgets, for documentation on that you should use www.toscawidgets.org You could also take a look

Re: Pylons widgets...?

Uhmm what about rum [1] and RumAlchemy ? Some cool things you might overlook http://rumdemo.toscawidgets.org/ [1]http://toscawidgets.org/documentation/rum/ --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pylons-d

Re: Pylons widgets...?

On Thu, 2008-12-18 at 17:12 -0500, Julio Napurí Carlos wrote: > > Uhmm > what about rum [1] and RumAlchemy ? > > Some cool things you might overlook http://rumdemo.toscawidgets.org/ > > [1]http://toscawidgets.org/documentation/rum/ Rum doesn't replace toscawidgets, it provides an admin app fr

Re: Pylons widgets...?

On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 4:12 PM, Julio Napurí Carlos wrote: > > Uhmm > what about rum [1] and RumAlchemy ? > > Some cool things you might overlook http://rumdemo.toscawidgets.org/ > > [1]http://toscawidgets.org/documentation/rum/ > As Iain pointed out Rum is a, admin tool build on top of TW, it

Re: Pylons widgets...?

On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 7:25 PM, Iain Duncan wrote: > > On Thu, 2008-12-18 at 17:12 -0500, Julio Napurí Carlos wrote: >> >> Uhmm >> what about rum [1] and RumAlchemy ? >> >> Some cool things you might overlook http://rumdemo.toscawidgets.org/ >> >> [1]http://toscawidgets.org/documentation/rum/ >

automatic form widgets

Hi, I'm heading down the road of using Genshi to automatically populate form field values and error messages as described . It sure would be nice to automatically create the form fields and do validation (a la FormEncode) simply via data

Re: automatic form widgets

st. Ben was involved in some discussion on the TG list about breaking widgets into its own package and I think the TG community are keen to update them to use Genshi. http://groups.google.co.uk/group/turbogears-trunk/browse_thread/thread/f20324648d812728/e6b63256541ff64e?lnk=gst&q=ben+widget

Re: automatic form widgets

es: http://svn.colorstudy.com/FormEncode/trunk/formencode/sqlschema.py The module will probably go away, but the implementation might be useful to you. It doesn't create widgets from a model class, but you could use a similar pattern for that too. Then it just needs some really good glue,

Re: automatic form widgets

> this? > > You might find this to be a useful example of extracting a schema from > SQLObject classes: > http://svn.colorstudy.com/FormEncode/trunk/formencode/sqlschema.py > > The module will probably go away, but the implementation might be useful > to you. It doesn&#x

Deform autocomplete tag sequence widgets?

Hello, I would like to have a tag widget similar to http://levycarneiro.com/projects/tag-it/example.html. Before I attempt to make this plugin work with Deform, does anyone know of an existing example available that already implements this type of widget in Deform? It seems to be a common way fo

how to create custom widgets/schemas ?

I just started to use deform and colander for form handling in Pyramid. Deform defines out of box form fields generation. But the problem is I have my own style of forms which is quite complicated? What is best solution to create custom widgets/schemas to do this? Is there a general way to create

Re: Deform autocomplete tag sequence widgets?

About the best resource to check there would be: http://deformdemo.repoze.org/ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pylons-discuss" group. To post to this group, send email to pylons-discuss@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to

how (Tosca)Widgets fits into MVC concept

Hi, I am playing with Pylons several weeks now and it's been a big joy to use. Everything just fits together and I think because of Pylons I finally start to get what MVC is all about and see the advantage of clear separation. The piece that I am not sure where it should go, are widgets. Th

Re: how to create custom widgets/schemas ?

Have a look here: http://docs.pylonsproject.org/projects/deform/dev/widget.html#writing-your-own-widget Explains it all, really. Keesjan -Oorspronkelijk bericht- From: wbwylbt Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2011 1:50 PM To: pylons-discuss Subject: how to create custom widgets/schemas ? I

Re: how (Tosca)Widgets fits into MVC concept

ion. > The piece that I am not sure where it should go, are widgets. The DRY > is great, boring error handling is great, but: AFAIK the validation > belons to the Model, but the UI belongs in the View, and the "gluing" > of M with V belongs to Controller. So the widgets go right

Re: how (Tosca)Widgets fits into MVC concept

ar separation. > The piece that I am not sure where it should go, are widgets. The DRY > is great, boring error handling is great, but: AFAIK the validation > belons to the Model, but the UI belongs in the View, and the "gluing" > of M with V belongs to Controller. So the widge

Re: how (Tosca)Widgets fits into MVC concept

of > clear separation. > The piece that I am not sure where it should go, are widgets. The DRY > is great, boring error handling is great, but: AFAIK the validation > belons to the Model, but the UI belongs in the View, and the "gluing" > of M with V belongs to Controller. So

Re: how (Tosca)Widgets fits into MVC concept

Thanks for feedback! New google groups interface seems not to have accepted my reaction from yesterday :( Just testing now... --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pylons-discuss" group. To post to this

Re: how (Tosca)Widgets fits into MVC concept

t my confusion with TG/TW widgets is more about it's implementation: - "general" widgets like TinyMCE, grids, js trees, select shuttle, etc. belong to the concept of "helpers". I dont care how they made, where they are installed on the system - I just want to use them. So the egg s

Re: how (Tosca)Widgets fits into MVC concept

> (Ok, seems to work :) > > After reading al your helpfull reactions I see that my confusion with > TG/TW widgets is more about it's implementation: > - "general" widgets like TinyMCE, grids, js trees, select shuttle, > etc. > belong to the concept of "help

how many people actually use authkit, formbuild or tosca-widgets ?

to me it seems like a waste of time to deal with some poorly written, poorly documented, poorly supported library that someone wrote with not much effort. Funny thing people spend way more time trying to figure out and use these libraries then either the time it took to write them or the time they

Re: how many people actually use authkit, formbuild or tosca-widgets ?

On Sat, Dec 27, 2008 at 2:19 AM, Tycon wrote: > > to me it seems like a waste of time to deal with some poorly written, > poorly documented, poorly supported > library that someone wrote with not much effort. Funny thing people > spend way more time trying to figure out and > use these libraries

Re: how many people actually use authkit, formbuild or tosca-widgets ?

On Sun, Dec 28, 2008 at 9:04 AM, Jorge Vargas wrote: > > On Sat, Dec 27, 2008 at 2:19 AM, Tycon wrote: >> >> to me it seems like a waste of time to deal with some poorly written, >> poorly documented, poorly supported >> library that someone wrote with not much effort. Funny thing people >> spen

Re: how many people actually use authkit, formbuild or tosca-widgets ?

> > > > Last but not least this is pylons, over here everything is optional. > > No one told you to use any of them. > > One thing that might be nice with Pylons, is if each optional > component had a rating system that included attributes such as: > > difficulty to learn: > full test coverage:

Re: how many people actually use authkit, formbuild or tosca-widgets ?

On Sun, Dec 28, 2008 at 9:48 AM, Iain Duncan wrote: > >> > >> > Last but not least this is pylons, over here everything is optional. >> > No one told you to use any of them. >> >> One thing that might be nice with Pylons, is if each optional >> component had a rating system that included attribut

Re: how many people actually use authkit, formbuild or tosca-widgets ?

On Sat, Dec 27, 2008 at 12:48 PM, Iain Duncan wrote: > >> > >> > Last but not least this is pylons, over here everything is optional. >> > No one told you to use any of them. >> >> One thing that might be nice with Pylons, is if each optional >> component had a rating system that included attribu

Re: how many people actually use authkit, formbuild or tosca-widgets ?

On Sat, 2008-12-27 at 16:51 -0800, Mike Orr wrote: > > On Sat, Dec 27, 2008 at 12:48 PM, Iain Duncan wrote: > > > >> > > >> > Last but not least this is pylons, over here everything is optional. > >> > No one told you to use any of them. > >> > >> One thing that might be nice with Pylons, is if

Re: how many people actually use authkit, formbuild or tosca-widgets ?

On Sun, Dec 28, 2008 at 5:50 PM, Iain Duncan wrote: > > On Sat, 2008-12-27 at 16:51 -0800, Mike Orr wrote: >> >> On Sat, Dec 27, 2008 at 12:48 PM, Iain Duncan wrote: >> > >> >> > >> >> > Last but not least this is pylons, over here everything is optional. >> >> > No one told you to use any of th

Re: how many people actually use authkit, formbuild or tosca-widgets ?

On Sat, Dec 27, 2008 at 9:10 PM, Noah Gift wrote: > > On Sun, Dec 28, 2008 at 5:50 PM, Iain Duncan wrote: >> >> On Sat, 2008-12-27 at 16:51 -0800, Mike Orr wrote: >>> >>> On Sat, Dec 27, 2008 at 12:48 PM, Iain Duncan wrote: >>> > >>> >> > >>> >> > Last but not least this is pylons, over here ev

Re: how many people actually use authkit, formbuild or tosca-widgets ?

before it became a standalone library Tosca was THE compelling reason for me to use turbogears. I love it. On Dec 27 2008, 3:04 pm, "Jorge Vargas" wrote: > On Sat, Dec 27, 2008 at 2:19 AM, Tycon wrote: > > > to me it seems like a waste of time to deal with some poorly written, > > poorly docume

is any one using tosca widgets or dynforms in real applications?

Hello all, I think the subject says it all. My questions is about tosca widgets. Is it production quality, has some one used in real apps and how good is dynforms for ajax based requirements? Also I wish to know if there is a way to change the css of forms generated by tosca? Happy hacking

Re: is any one using tosca widgets or dynforms in real applications?

the folks on the toscawidgets mailing list would probably be better qualified to answer that kind of question. I haven't used tw2 in a while but you should be able to override the templates of all the widgets for maximum flexibility, but you can also assign a series of css classes. So th

Re: is any one using tosca widgets or dynforms in real applications?

ly be better qualified to answer that kind of question. I haven't used tw2 in a while but you should be able to override the templates of all the widgets for maximum flexibility, but you can also assign a series of css classes. So there's 2 options for you. On Saturday, February 23, 2

Re: is any one using tosca widgets or dynforms in real applications?

hi krishnakant, 1) use tw2, not tw1. 2) you can definitely customize the form css. 3) you can also customize the generated forms via custom templates. On Feb 23, 5:35 pm, Krishnakant Mane wrote: > Hello all, > I think the subject says it all. > My questions is about tosca widgets

Re: is any one using tosca widgets or dynforms in real applications?

Hello, thanks for the help. On 02/25/2013 01:27 AM, Mengu wrote: hi krishnakant, 1) use tw2, not tw1. That is understood, given that there are so many new things I see in the docs (I had tryed version 1 before ). 2) you can definitely customize the form css. Well, this is exactly what I wish t

Re: is any one using tosca widgets or dynforms in real applications?

if you specify a template for a widget, it will use that template. On Feb 25, 1:14 pm, Krishnakant Mane wrote: > Hello, thanks for the help. > On 02/25/2013 01:27 AM, Mengu wrote:> hi krishnakant, > > > 1) use tw2, not tw1. > > That is understood, given that there are so many new things I see in

Re: is any one using tosca widgets or dynforms in real applications?

On Monday, February 25, 2013 6:14:43 AM UTC-5, kk.gnu wrote: > > Hello, thanks for the help. ... > > 3) you can also customize the generated forms via custom templates. > This is some thing I did not understand. Could you clearify? > > The base class that presumably al